Peter Boghossian and Asger Folmann talk about impossible conversations, and how the future of "soft"/social science may look. They also cover social justice warriors, and how several academic fields have become so ideology and agenda driven, that they almost resemble religions. What's the underlying issue, and are there any reasonable solutions?
***
Crypto & fiat VISA card, free $50 and 2% CASHBACK on all purchases here: https://platinum.crypto.com/r/asger
Ref code: asger
NOTE: You must stake 50 MCO (easily done in the app) to get the free $50 and 2% cashback.
***
Peter’s book, How to Have Impossible Conversations: https://amzn.to/2XkzJSh
***
The Grievance Studies Affair: https://bit.ly/2tEAA0g
***
James Lindsay's website: https://newdiscourses.com/
***
Disconfirmation = defeasibility: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defeasibility
***
Benjamin A Boyce (mentioned ~41 min. mark): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCm13xHVNFVwzHzK3QHSaZ3Q/featured
***
APA Delphi Report: https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/SocialSciences/ppecorino/CT-Expert-Report.pdf
***
Peter Boghossian on Twitter: https://twitter.com/peterboghossian
***
Asger Folmann on Twitter: https://twitter.com/Asger_Folmann
***
Guest requests, topics you want me to explore, and general discussion: JOIN the group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/2587879611435927/
***
Get in touch here: metaquestcontact@gmail.com
***
#PeterBoghossian #SocialJusticeWarriors #Epistemology
