All content for Lawyering Peace: Hot Takes is the property of Lawyering Peace and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The Khartoum Peace Agreement (1997): Perfect on Paper, Problematic in Practice?
Lawyering Peace: Hot Takes
32 minutes 20 seconds
1 year ago
The Khartoum Peace Agreement (1997): Perfect on Paper, Problematic in Practice?
At first glance, the 1997 Khartoum Peace Agreement appeared to be a perfect solution to Sudan's enduring civil war, promising peace and unity. But was it truly effective? Join host Heba Bawaieh with experts Dr. Paul Williams and Professor Milena Sterio as they peel back the layers of this seemingly ideal agreement to reveal the underlying complexities and challenges.
This episode delves into the conditions that necessitated this agreement, the key players involved, and the legal nuances that influenced its effectiveness and shortcomings. From power sharing to the contentious issues of Sharia law and amnesty for war crimes, this episode unpacks how these elements influenced the broader landscape of peace negotiations. The discussion also explores the agreement's broader implications for Sudan's future and the essential lessons today’s peace negotiators can glean from this historical accord.
Music Credit:
Scott Buckley - Signal To Noise [Link to music]