Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
History
Fiction
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts125/v4/8e/e1/70/8ee17050-e887-a1e7-9206-d2f7e6baee2a/mza_2613409785160595463.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Law & Business Video
Anthony M. Verna III, Esq.
38 episodes
1 week ago
This podcast is hosted by Anthony M. Verna III, Esq. Anthony focuses on Intellectual Property including trademark, copyright, patent, licensing, advertising/promotion and food law and domain name disputes. For more visit vernalaw.com. Attorney advertising.
Show more...
Entrepreneurship
Business
RSS
All content for Law & Business Video is the property of Anthony M. Verna III, Esq. and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
This podcast is hosted by Anthony M. Verna III, Esq. Anthony focuses on Intellectual Property including trademark, copyright, patent, licensing, advertising/promotion and food law and domain name disputes. For more visit vernalaw.com. Attorney advertising.
Show more...
Entrepreneurship
Business
https://vernalaw.com/wp-content/uploads/powerpress/podcast_image.jpg
Video Blog 31: Patent FAQ: Can I get a Patent on my Software Invention?
Law & Business Video
5 years ago
Video Blog 31: Patent FAQ: Can I get a Patent on my Software Invention?

This is another video blog to go with our Patent Law FAQ - we hope you continue to enjoy our video blogs.



Here is a lighted-edited transcript of the blog:



Can I get a patent on my software?



I'm Anthony Verna, managing partner of Verna Law, P.C, where we focus on intellectual property and advertising law.



The short answer is “Maybe.” “It depends.” Lawyer answers, of course.



Let's talk a little bit about what a patent for a software invention would require.



Number one: the algorithm, because that's really what we're patenting, has to be new. Our algorithm - or your algorithm - has to be novel. Your algorithm also has to be non-obvious.



This is the typical standard for any utility patent.



However, we had a case about, let's call it six years ago, in which the Supreme Court said that an algorithmic patent must include an inventive step. What does that mean, six years later? We're all still a little confused about that, but what I would say is: What does your software, what does your algorithm do that is truly different from an algorithmic standpoint?Is it more efficient? And how is that efficiency defined? Some algorithms are defined by processing time, especially with software. Some algorithms are defined by user interface and how the user changes the interface. That's going to be considered an inventive step.



All of that is something to consider while we ask the question, “Can I get a patent on my software invention?”



Just remember, it's a very high bar. And as a matter of fact, the, Patent and Trademark Office, after the Supreme Court's decision a few years ago, took all software and algorithmic patent applications and put them to the side before they were considered, before an inventive step could truly be defined.



The USPTO has their definition. We don't really know what that particular definition is, but we really see that those software patents that do something truly different from an efficiency standpoint are the ones that are granted. That's what's really hitting that bar.



Again, I'm Anthony Verna, managing partner Verna Law. See us at vernalaw.com for all IP questions. Thank you.
Law & Business Video
This podcast is hosted by Anthony M. Verna III, Esq. Anthony focuses on Intellectual Property including trademark, copyright, patent, licensing, advertising/promotion and food law and domain name disputes. For more visit vernalaw.com. Attorney advertising.