Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
History
Fiction
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts125/v4/8e/e1/70/8ee17050-e887-a1e7-9206-d2f7e6baee2a/mza_2613409785160595463.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Law & Business Video
Anthony M. Verna III, Esq.
38 episodes
1 week ago
This podcast is hosted by Anthony M. Verna III, Esq. Anthony focuses on Intellectual Property including trademark, copyright, patent, licensing, advertising/promotion and food law and domain name disputes. For more visit vernalaw.com. Attorney advertising.
Show more...
Entrepreneurship
Business
RSS
All content for Law & Business Video is the property of Anthony M. Verna III, Esq. and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
This podcast is hosted by Anthony M. Verna III, Esq. Anthony focuses on Intellectual Property including trademark, copyright, patent, licensing, advertising/promotion and food law and domain name disputes. For more visit vernalaw.com. Attorney advertising.
Show more...
Entrepreneurship
Business
https://vernalaw.com/wp-content/uploads/powerpress/podcast_image.jpg
Video Blog 23: Algorithm and Business Method Patents: Searches Needed
Law & Business Video
5 years ago
Video Blog 23: Algorithm and Business Method Patents: Searches Needed

Here at Verna Law, one of our goals of 2020 is to keep
growing our patent practice, especially with our patent agent, Wil Jacques.



Recently we've had a couple phone calls with potential
clients who have business method or algorithmic patent ideas. In the last four
or five years, ever since the Supreme Court decided a case called Alice,
business method and algorithmic patents have been harder to procure.



The reason for this is as time has gone on, a case has gone
to the Supreme court and Supreme court said, “We're not saying that all
algorithmic patents are void, just this algorithmic patent is void,” and well
then there'd be another case and then that algorithmic patent was void until
Alice.



What happened in Alice a few years ago? The Supreme court said
that not all algorithmic patents are void, but they need to have an “inventive
step.”



And where did the Supreme court decide to get this language?


Nobody really knows, but it's an extra speed bump for algorithmic and business
method patents.



So, it requires making sure that the algorithm that is being presented in a patent application is really and truly new and novel, which is what the statute already says, but now whatever an “inventive step” still means, while we're still not 100% sure even three or four years down the down the line after that decision, but we need to make sure that we do our patent search.



We need to make sure that we're thorough with that search.
We need to find what other algorithms have anything to say with the algorithms
that our potential clients give to us. And that's really the key is that first
step, not yet drafting the claims that's truly important, but that first step
of finding everything in the prior art that's out there.



That's something that we try to do very well and especially
with the algorithmic patents and especially with ever since the Supreme court
decision requiring an extra inventive step in algorithmic patents.



I'm Anthony Verna, managing partner Verna Law, focusing on IP and advertising law. Visit us at vernalaw.com, click on patents and you'll see everything that we have to do with patents.



Thanks very much.
Law & Business Video
This podcast is hosted by Anthony M. Verna III, Esq. Anthony focuses on Intellectual Property including trademark, copyright, patent, licensing, advertising/promotion and food law and domain name disputes. For more visit vernalaw.com. Attorney advertising.