Have you ever wondered why leaders who promise so much often deliver so little, especially in contexts like Kenya? This podcast delves into a profound question posed by Niccolò Machiavelli centuries ago and confirmed by modern psychology: what if the people least suited to lead are precisely the ones most likely to attain leadership positions?

Drawing insights from "Philosophy Coded" and research in psychology, we explore the "leadership paradox": the attributes that help someone rise to power can make them poor stewards of that power. We'll examine how traits such as unwavering confidence, charismatic self-presentation, and bold visions often give individuals a significant advantage in leadership competitions, even when their actual abilities don't justify this perception. Research shows that confidence is often preferred over accuracy, and those displaying it, even when wrong, gain higher social status.

We'll discuss how appearance often matters more than actual competence, and how leaders who understand optimism bias can use "magician's misdirection" to gain and maintain influence. This often means simplicity is preferred over complexity, and simple, decisive answers are chosen over nuanced thinking, even when complex problems demand more. The sources suggest that individuals with naturally lower empathy may find it easier to project the decisiveness and emotional stability we associate with leadership. While these traits might help leaders rise, they don't necessarily make for effective leadership once in power, often leading to volatility and underperformance.

While our sources discuss these universal patterns in power dynamics and human psychology, we will explore how these dynamics can be seen playing out in current leadership challenges in Kenya. We'll consider if our systems are systematically choosing the wrong types of people for leadership roles and what lessons can be learned from exceptions like Seretse Khama or Nelson Mandela, who governed with humility, integrity, and genuine concern for citizen welfare, creating lasting legacies. The podcast will also touch upon the potential for redesigning leadership selection systems to prioritize actual outcomes over interview performance, implement mandatory trial periods and 360-degree reviews, separate the power to propose from the power to approve, assign devil's advocates, and introduce term limits to mitigate these risks.

This podcast aims to help listeners, like a truly Machiavellian citizen, understand these dynamics well enough to select leaders who will serve the common good rather than their own grandiosity, urging us to see through the crown to the reality of leadership.