Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review

https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts116/v4/cc/51/d7/cc51d77a-0f49-6020-7ce5-35fe92aa091f/mza_7656291727597501317.jpeg/600x600bb.jpg

J&J Editorial Podcast

J&J Editorial

11 episodes

8 months ago

J&J Editorial's team of scholarly publishing experts explore science and publishing through the lens of best practices and processes. http://jjeditorial.com

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Society & Culture

RSS

All content for J&J Editorial Podcast is the property of J&J Editorial and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

J&J Editorial's team of scholarly publishing experts explore science and publishing through the lens of best practices and processes. http://jjeditorial.com

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Society & Culture

https://assets.pippa.io/shows/63c70eeb61264b0011b952fe/1676491075955-1825a44a7549296f9f00d444eb0a90a0.jpeg

Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review - Part 2 #PeerRevWk17

J&J Editorial Podcast

23 minutes 5 seconds

8 years ago

Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review - Part 2 #PeerRevWk17

Part 2 of our Transparency in Peer Review discussion with Tom Lang (Tom Lang Communications and Training International), Allison Leung (PLOS), David Resnik, JD, PhD (NIEHS), and Pedro Ramirez, MD (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). In this installment we take a closer look at how transparency in review benefits researchers. Music: www.bensound.com

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.