In this episode, we examine the evolution of trademark dilution law, comparing its origins and development in the United States and European Union. Trademark dilution protects well-known brands from uses that may weaken their distinctiveness or tarnish their reputation, even in the absence of direct competition or consumer confusion.

In the United States, the Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA) of 1995 introduced dilution as a formal protection mechanism, later refined by the Trademark Dilution Revision Act (TDRA) of 2006. Under the TDRA, a trademark owner must prove that their mark is "famous" and show that the third-party use either blurs or tarnishes the brand’s distinctiveness. Landmark cases like Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. and Tiffany v. eBay have shaped the interpretation of dilution, establishing that a likelihood of dilution, rather than actual dilution, is sufficient for protection under US law.

In the European Union, dilution protection is embedded within the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR) and the Trade Marks Directive. Unlike in the US, the EU framework allows broader protection for well-known marks, protecting against both "blurring" and "tarnishment" across all EU member states. A pivotal case, L’Oréal v. Bellure, established that third-party uses evoking the mental image of a well-known mark could amount to unfair advantage, thereby reinforcing EU standards on dilution.

The episode discusses the unique paths that the US and EU have taken toward trademark dilution, examining how each legal framework balances brand protection with free expression and market competition. Through prominent case law and statutory developments, this episode highlights the challenges in enforcing dilution law and the impact of cultural and economic differences on its application across these jurisdictions.