This episode provides an in-depth look at the legal framework governing trademark transactions under Common Law systems, such as those in the UK and the US, as well as in the European Union. We explore how trademarks, as valuable assets, are frequently subject to transactions like licensing, assignment, franchising, and securitization, which require distinct legal approaches and protections to maintain brand integrity and commercial value.

In Common Law jurisdictions, trademark transactions are primarily governed by case law and statutes. Key concepts include the principles of goodwill, non-assignment in gross (assigning a trademark without transferring the associated goodwill), and the treatment of licenses, which vary in exclusivity and scope depending on the agreement. We discuss how trademark assignments and licensing must respect these fundamental principles to be legally enforceable, especially as seen in cases where assignments impact consumer perceptions of quality and source.

In the EU, trademark transactions are regulated by the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR) and associated directives, creating a harmonized approach across member states. The episode addresses how EU law facilitates trademark transfers while enforcing strict rules around quality control, continuity of brand perception, and trademark use to prevent “naked licensing,” where a mark’s distinctiveness could be jeopardized. Additionally, we look at the procedural requirements for recording trademark transactions at the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to ensure that trademarks retain their enforceable status across all EU jurisdictions.

Finally, we consider how these different frameworks affect international trademark transactions, particularly in light of recent regulatory changes and trade agreements that impact cross-border IP transactions. This comparative analysis provides essential insights for navigating trademark deals within and across Common Law and EU systems.