Strategic Institute for Innovation in Government Contracting
66 episodes
4 months ago
In this episode Strategic Institute talks about recent Congressional language that seeks to broaden the aperture when it comes to who and what qualifies for OTA awards, while at the same time the bureaucracy is attempting to narrow the thinking around OTAs and kneecap their potential. Who should be served, the will of 'the people' as represented by Congress -or- should the bureaucracy take precedent? Also discussed are clear solutions using OTAs, current lack of incentives, who should ...
All content for Innovation in Government Business is the property of Strategic Institute for Innovation in Government Contracting and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
In this episode Strategic Institute talks about recent Congressional language that seeks to broaden the aperture when it comes to who and what qualifies for OTA awards, while at the same time the bureaucracy is attempting to narrow the thinking around OTAs and kneecap their potential. Who should be served, the will of 'the people' as represented by Congress -or- should the bureaucracy take precedent? Also discussed are clear solutions using OTAs, current lack of incentives, who should ...
Effectively Utilizing Other Transactions: A Program Manager's Perspective
Innovation in Government Business
40 minutes
2 years ago
Effectively Utilizing Other Transactions: A Program Manager's Perspective
In this episode Rick Dunn with the Strategic Institute, talks with Maj. Ben Leaf currently assigned to USSOCOM about his experiences utilizing Other Transactions Agreements to deliver excellent results. Ben discusses his experience that highlights the importance of the team, open mindedness, and lawyers who enable business process innovation. This is story of how goal oriented action produces positive outcomes.
Innovation in Government Business
In this episode Strategic Institute talks about recent Congressional language that seeks to broaden the aperture when it comes to who and what qualifies for OTA awards, while at the same time the bureaucracy is attempting to narrow the thinking around OTAs and kneecap their potential. Who should be served, the will of 'the people' as represented by Congress -or- should the bureaucracy take precedent? Also discussed are clear solutions using OTAs, current lack of incentives, who should ...
