Strategic Institute for Innovation in Government Contracting
66 episodes
4 months ago
In this episode Strategic Institute talks about recent Congressional language that seeks to broaden the aperture when it comes to who and what qualifies for OTA awards, while at the same time the bureaucracy is attempting to narrow the thinking around OTAs and kneecap their potential. Who should be served, the will of 'the people' as represented by Congress -or- should the bureaucracy take precedent? Also discussed are clear solutions using OTAs, current lack of incentives, who should ...
All content for Innovation in Government Business is the property of Strategic Institute for Innovation in Government Contracting and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
In this episode Strategic Institute talks about recent Congressional language that seeks to broaden the aperture when it comes to who and what qualifies for OTA awards, while at the same time the bureaucracy is attempting to narrow the thinking around OTAs and kneecap their potential. Who should be served, the will of 'the people' as represented by Congress -or- should the bureaucracy take precedent? Also discussed are clear solutions using OTAs, current lack of incentives, who should ...
DoD's S&T Strategy 2023 is a "wish list" not strategy
Innovation in Government Business
30 minutes
2 years ago
DoD's S&T Strategy 2023 is a "wish list" not strategy
OUSD R/E recently published "National Defense Science and Technology Strategy 2023" that contains ZERO consequential strategy and parrots what others have said ad nauseam. The document correctly identifies that there is a very serious problem with the government system for delivering the fruits of taxpayer funded R&D efforts. It identifies point A and points to B, but offers absolutely no practical guidance or ideas of how to get there. In the case of contracting ...
Innovation in Government Business
In this episode Strategic Institute talks about recent Congressional language that seeks to broaden the aperture when it comes to who and what qualifies for OTA awards, while at the same time the bureaucracy is attempting to narrow the thinking around OTAs and kneecap their potential. Who should be served, the will of 'the people' as represented by Congress -or- should the bureaucracy take precedent? Also discussed are clear solutions using OTAs, current lack of incentives, who should ...
