We are lawyers talking about movies. Each week Mike, Matt, and Logan pick a movie, an actor, and a year. We review the film and each give a rating up to 5 stars. We look at the actor's career, including their choice of roles, performances, and how they stack up against others. Then we look at the year and examine the winner for Best Picture and the other nominees, as well as other notable movies, before rendering a verdict on which film should have won. Sometimes we argue.
All content for In Camera Review is the property of In Camera Review and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
We are lawyers talking about movies. Each week Mike, Matt, and Logan pick a movie, an actor, and a year. We review the film and each give a rating up to 5 stars. We look at the actor's career, including their choice of roles, performances, and how they stack up against others. Then we look at the year and examine the winner for Best Picture and the other nominees, as well as other notable movies, before rendering a verdict on which film should have won. Sometimes we argue.
David Lynch’s surrealistic masterpiece ‘Mulholland Drive’ is discussed. Viggo Mortensen is compared to Daniel Day-Lewis and the 76th Oscars are examined, including the Best Picture Winner- the third installment of the Lord of the Rings trilogy
In Camera Review
We are lawyers talking about movies. Each week Mike, Matt, and Logan pick a movie, an actor, and a year. We review the film and each give a rating up to 5 stars. We look at the actor's career, including their choice of roles, performances, and how they stack up against others. Then we look at the year and examine the winner for Best Picture and the other nominees, as well as other notable movies, before rendering a verdict on which film should have won. Sometimes we argue.
