Is the postwar liberal order finally coming undone? And if so – what comes next? The liberal order is dying – not liberalism as an idea, but the postwar regime of managed decline, elite control, and fake freedom. This talk exposes how that order hollowed out real autonomy, smothered politics, and bred a generation of anxious, atomised subjects. But if it's ending, what replaces it? Populist parties are rising – but do they have the stomach for revolution, or just nostalgia and slogans? With five sharp tests – from institutional guts to faith in ordinary people – this lecture challenges any would-be populist movement to prove it stands for freedom, not just power.

This lecture explores the emergence of the American New Right – a diffuse and provocative intellectual tendency gaining visibility in the wake of the populist revolts of 2016. Focusing on figures like Patrick Deneen and Curtis Yarvin, it examines their critiques of liberalism, meritocracy, and democracy, as well as their visions of authority, order, and political renewal. While often dismissed as marginal or extreme, these thinkers articulate deeper dissatisfactions with modernity, autonomy, and the liberal elite consensus. The talk considers whether their ideas offer a serious response to the current political malaise – or reflect a more inward-looking, aristocratic impulse seeking meaning in a post-liberal age.

What if the most radical act today is remembering who we are? In this brilliant, rousing address, political strategist and historian-in-spirit Gawain Towler argues that British history is not a relic – it’s a shield, a compass, and the last line of defence against tyranny, technocracy, and cultural amnesia. From Kipling to Alan Macfarlane, from the Glorious Revolution to Brexit, this lecture traces the deep roots of English individualism and the unique political culture that has helped Britain resist the ideological storms of the continent. It’s not superiority – it’s memory. And when history is forgotten, freedom soon follows.

Is populism enough? Or is the real crisis deeper – moral, spiritual, civilisational? In this sweeping and provocative lecture, theologian and political philosopher John Milbank argues that post-liberalism is not a reactionary impulse or a right-wing fad, but a serious and British-born intellectual tradition rooted in the thought of Alasdair MacIntyre, John Gray, and religious communitarianism. Milbank critiques both market liberalism and cultural liberalism, showing how they converge into a nihilistic uniparty – a cold, technocratic system with no room for virtue, rootedness, or the common good.

Can a generation obsessed with authenticity even recognise what’s real anymore? This wide-ranging and incisive talk explores Vincenzo Latronico’s Perfection, a haunting millennial rewrite of Georges Perec’s Things: A Story of the Sixties (1965). What begins as an exercise in literary homage becomes something far deeper: a cultural diagnosis of a generation adrift.

What does it mean to belong – to a country, a culture, a civilisation? In this provocative and wide-ranging talk, we explore the deep tensions between citizenship and belonging in modern Britain and the West. From the strange status of “Britishness” to the hollowing out of national identity under liberal universalism, this talk challenges the idea that citizenship is just a passport or a legal status. It asks what kind of real community sustains a nation – and whether we still have one.

What happens when everything becomes public – our thoughts, our feelings, even our intimacy? In this sweeping and brilliant talk, we trace the collapse of the boundary between public and private life, showing how an idea once central to Western freedom – the right to a private self – has quietly disintegrated. From 17th-century sermons warning against “doing in private what you’d fear in public,” through the Protestant Reformation and the invention of the novel, to the cultural revolution of the 1970s and the surveillance anxieties of today, this is the story of how privacy was born, deformed, and finally dissolved.

Alienation. Estrangement. A loss of voice. Across the West, millions feel like strangers in the very places they once called home – but are told they're not allowed to say it. Frank Furedi cuts through the noise and exposes the silent war on language, belonging, and common sense. This is not just cultural drift – it's a deliberate attempt by elites to sever our connection to community, tradition, and truth. From the censorship of patriotic feeling to the vilification of “common sense,” Furedi reveals how we’ve been robbed of the words to describe what we’re living through – and how a new political language rooted in shared reality is urgently needed. This talk is a wake-up call. If you feel silenced, if you’re tired of being gaslit by technocrats and media elites who mock your love of country as “hate” – this is for you. This video is a lecture from The Academy 2025. The subject of the weekend event was "Upheaval: Why politics needs a new language". You can find out more here: https://ideasmatter.org.uk/upheaval-why-politics-needs-a-new-language Professor Frank Furedi is executive director of MCC Brussels and a renowned writer and commentator.

The concept of high culture has come under sustained attack. Once understood as a repository of human achievement, high culture is now dismissed as elitist, exclusionary, or worse—merely the expression of dead white European males. The modern academy, far from upholding cultural excellence, now works to deconstruct it. But high culture is not merely a reflection of power. It is a source of intellectual and imaginative expansion, a means of transcending the present, and a vital counterbalance to the shallowness of mass consumer culture. A world without cultural traditions is a world without identity—one that is intellectually impoverished, emotionally stunted, and incapable of producing greatness.

Words are civilisation’s golden-thread: the durable link from Homer to Orwell that turns tribes into free peoples. Yet our own elites now treat language as toxic waste to be inspected, licensed or burned. This lecture storms through 2,000 years to show why killing words means killing the West itself. Lose the freedom to read and speak, and the West’s hard-won gains – from Shakespeare to the Suffrage – unravel overnight.

Modern universities have become bureaucratic engines of conformity, hostile to the very civilisation they owe everything to. In this eye-opening lecture, Professor Simon Haines, founding director of the Ramsay Centre for Western Civilisation (Sydney), explains how we can rescue the humanities by reintroducing students to the foundational texts – not as objects of activist deconstruction, but as living forces of thought, freedom and moral complexity.

As Vicky Richardson argues in this talk, cultural institutions today stand at a crossroads. Once dedicated to excellence, artistic achievement, and the preservation of tradition, they are now paralysed by fear. Leadership teams are more concerned with ideological positioning than curatorial expertise, and in their attempts to reframe institutions as platforms for political debate, they risk alienating both their audiences and their own staff. This talk explores the roots of the crisis facing our museums and galleries. Institutions must be held to higher standards—before they destroy themselves.

The Industrial Revolution was supposed to set humanity free. It promised progress—mastery over nature, freedom from suffering, and a future shaped by human reason. It gave us the means to solve problems that once seemed like fate, to subject the world to human ingenuity and build a civilisation of liberty, equality, and fraternity. But something went wrong. Instead of controlling the world, we turned inward, seeking to control ourselves. Today, we no longer dream of engineering great structures—we seek to engineer the human mind. The great optimism of the Enlightenment has given way to a deep post-liberal pessimism, a belief that the real problem isn't the world but us. 

In this talk, Ann Furedi argues that Human civilization is built on the distinctiveness of our species—the awareness that we exist in time, with a past, present, and future, and that we are unique in our capacity for rationality, morality, and creativity. But this foundational understanding is being dismantled.   🔹 Posthumanism & Post-Anthropocentrism – The dominant academic and cultural narratives now deny human exceptionalism. They argue that human rationality is no more significant than a hare’s ability to run fast.   🔹 The Reversal of Human Privilege – We are no longer elevating animals to human standards (as in the Great Ape Project); instead, we are lowering ourselves to the level of animals. Books now teach us to embrace our animality, and even bestiality is being reframed as just another form of queering boundaries.   🔹 The End of the Human Narrative – Civilization has always depended on human consciousness, the ability to reflect, plan, and build for future generations. If we reject the idea that humans are special, we lose the foundation of civilization itself.

The Industrial Revolution was the single greatest leap forward in human history. As Nikos Sotirakopoulos argues in this talk, it didn’t just give us more—more wealth, more technology, more life expectancy—it gave us a different kind of life altogether. It unleashed human ingenuity, freed individuals from drudgery, and created a society where innovation and creativity could flourish. But today, the very foundations of industrial civilisation are under attack. Environmentalists, neo-Luddites, and cultural elites see human progress as a sin. They tell us that reshaping the world is destructive, that human impact on nature is evil, and that industry is something to apologise for rather than celebrate. Worse, even the defenders of industrial society fail to grasp its full significance, reducing it to GDP charts rather than recognising it as the ultimate triumph of human reason, freedom, and ambition. The intellectual foundations that made it possible—free speech, free markets, and a belief in human mastery over nature—are eroding. If we do not fight for these values, the industrial world we take for granted will disappear.

The fall of the Soviet Union in 1989 was supposed to be a triumphant moment for the West. But, as Tim Black argues in this lecture, instead of securing a lasting victory for liberal democracy, it created an existential crisis. For decades, the Cold War had given the West a clear sense of purpose—defeating communism, leading the "Free World," and shaping global history. But with the USSR gone, Western elites were left disoriented, scrambling for a new narrative. Enter Samuel Huntington. In The Clash of Civilisations, he rejected the naïve optimism of thinkers like Francis Fukuyama, who proclaimed "the end of history." Instead, Huntington argued that the world was not moving toward a universal liberal order, but toward an era of civilizational conflict. Cultural and religious identities, not ideology or economics, would define the post-Cold War world.  Huntington’s great mistake? He saw the West as under siege from external forces—Islam, China, and non-Western civilizations—but failed to grasp the deeper rot. The true threat to Western civilisation is not coming from Beijing or Tehran but from within—from Western elites who have spent decades dismantling their own culture, disavowing their own history, and undermining the very values that once made the West dominant.

In this important lecture, Professor Bill Durodie argues that the real threat to Western civilisation isn’t external—it’s internal. We are not in a clash of civilisations but a crisis of culture. 🔹 Loss of Shared Culture – Tradition has been discarded, but nothing has replaced it. Fragmentation replaces continuity. 🔹 From Resilience to Fragility – A society that once rebuilt after the Blitz now responds to crises with run, hide, tell. 🔹 Flattening of Meaning – Culture is reduced to checklists, identity to performance, and history to a crime scene. 🔹 Managerialism Over Meaning – Bureaucrats and data rule over wisdom and creativity; even art is state-funded into irrelevance.   Western civilisation’s problem isn’t external enemies—it’s self-doubt. Until the West believes in itself again, no defence will be enough. This is not a cultural war but a cultural vacuum. It is not a debate over competing ideas but a surrender of ideas altogether. We do not need to defend Western civilization from outsiders—we need to recover it from ourselves.

Lord Frost, the former chief negotiator for the UK's Brexit negotiations, argues in this talk that Western Civilization, the most creative and dynamic force in human history, now stands at a crossroads. The defining elements of its success—intellectual dynamism, economic freedom, individual autonomy, and the ability to absorb and refine ideas—are under sustained attack.   🔹 The erosion of national identity and political sovereignty—Western states are being dismantled in favour of transnational bureaucracies that undermine democratic decision-making and political experimentation. 🔹 A retreat from economic liberty—The vast expansion of state power has weakened the extended order of free individuals, replacing it with a fragile system of centralised control. 🔹 Cultural and demographic transformation—Unchecked migration from non-western societies is reshaping the social fabric, without integration into the traditions and values that made the West successful. 🔹 The rise of intellectual collectivism—Governments no longer just set laws but now demand active compliance with state-mandated objectives. The citizen is no longer free but subject to the ideological whims of the managerial elite. Yet the greatest danger is not external enemies—it is our own complacency.   The West has survived many crises before, but it will not survive unless its people are willing to fight for it. The alternative is decline: a slow slide into an authoritarian, post-Western order where the individual is subordinated to collective goals dictated from above. 

Western civilisation faces a two-pronged assault – but are both attackers closer than they appear? In this uncompromising lecture, Professor Frank Furedi exposes the internal collapse of civilisational confidence in the West and its convenient projection onto foreign foes. From the lecture halls of London to the tunnels of Gaza, decolonisation and Islamism reveal a shared contempt for the Western project – one that elites are increasingly unable (or unwilling) to defend.   📖 Topics Covered • Decolonial dogma – why the West’s own academics now frame it as a criminal enterprise • Islamism’s rise – and why its supporters find comfortable homes in Western institutions • Russia, China and the colonial smear – weaponised history as geopolitical strategy • The left–Islamist alliance – what unites Hamas and Harvard • Western conservatism’s failure – and the temptation to outsource blame • The real crisis – not Islam or ideology, but a West that can’t explain itself

Shakespeare isn’t just a relic of the past—he is one of the foundational figures of Western civilisation. Yet today, activists and cultural gatekeepers seek to reduce him to just another “dead white man,” claiming his legacy is nothing more than a product of colonialism and outdated values. This couldn’t be further from the truth. In this talk, Andrew Doyle dismantles these ideological attacks and makes the case for Shakespeare’s enduring importance. His works capture the complexities of human nature, shape our cultural identity, and stand as monuments to the heights of artistic achievement. But in an age where art is expected to serve politics, where great works are rewritten to fit ideological narratives, and where our cultural institutions are captured by identity politics, what is at stake if we let these voices tear down our greatest playwright? 📖 Topics Covered: Why Shakespeare is a cornerstone of Western civilisation How ideological activists distort art to serve their agenda The danger of politicised theatre and bad modern adaptations Why Shakespeare’s plays are universal, not “Eurocentric” The conditions that allowed Shakespeare to emerge—and why we may never see his like again 🎭 “If you read Shakespeare through the lens of identity politics, you’re not reading Shakespeare at all.” This isn’t just a defence of a playwright—it’s a defence of the cultural heritage under attack.