Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
TV & Film
Health & Fitness
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts116/v4/1c/f4/d2/1cf4d28e-6884-0949-1f88-a9440604e41b/mza_7617188651792765753.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
High School SCOTUS
Elise Spenner
21 episodes
3 days ago
Two teenagers analyze how the decisions of the Supreme Court and the words of the Constitution play out behind the schoolhouse gate, with the help of legal experts, law professors, and attorneys.
Show more...
Government
RSS
All content for High School SCOTUS is the property of Elise Spenner and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Two teenagers analyze how the decisions of the Supreme Court and the words of the Constitution play out behind the schoolhouse gate, with the help of legal experts, law professors, and attorneys.
Show more...
Government
https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/production/podcast_uploaded_nologo/21074552/21074552-1642658797120-6a642f6e165ee.jpg
Testing the Diversity Rationale with Jonathan Masur
High School SCOTUS
46 minutes 30 seconds
3 years ago
Testing the Diversity Rationale with Jonathan Masur

In the second episode of their series on affirmative action, Elise and Hannah sit down with Professor Jonathan Masur of the University of Chicago Law School to discuss his study "Assessing Affirmative Action's Diversity Rationale," written with Professors Justin Driver, Kyle Rozema, and Adam Chilton. The study analyzed how citations to law review journals changed in the years after implementing a diversity policy as a microcosm to empirically measure the impact of diversity in higher education. Listen to the episode to hear more about their findings and the study's relevance to the cultural and social debate around affirmative action.

Mentioned in this episode:

"Assessing Affirmative Action's Diversity Rationale"

DeFungis v. Odegaard (1974)

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) and Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)

Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007)

Further reading:

The New York Times: "As Harvard Case Looms at Supreme Court, Study Tests Value of Diversity"

The Atlantic: "Why Sandra Day O'Connor Saved Affirmative Action"

NPR: "Two Justices Debate The Doctrine of Colorblindness"

High School SCOTUS
Two teenagers analyze how the decisions of the Supreme Court and the words of the Constitution play out behind the schoolhouse gate, with the help of legal experts, law professors, and attorneys.