Episode 4: Evidential Reasoning & Evidence Law (ft. Giovanni Tuzet)

https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts122/v4/16/64/96/16649649-7e9f-f91c-3547-4d2b1dae87f2/mza_11442813373826999176.jpg/600x600bb.jpg

Heavily Accented Philosophy of Law

ALF Project

10 episodes

5 hours ago

Heavily Accented Philosophy of Law podcast (HAPL) is an initiative of EU Twinning Project ALF (“Advancing Cooperation on the Foundations of Law”). ALF is a project coordinated by the Center for Legal Fundamentals of the Faculty of Law University of Belgrade. To know more about the project: https://alf.ius.bg.ac.rs/

Social Sciences

Science

RSS

All content for Heavily Accented Philosophy of Law is the property of ALF Project and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

Social Sciences

Science

https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/40665294/40665294-1709820517487-95abf4f8f9725.jpg

Episode 4: Evidential Reasoning & Evidence Law (ft. Giovanni Tuzet)

Heavily Accented Philosophy of Law

1 hour 37 minutes 27 seconds

1 year ago

Episode 4: Evidential Reasoning & Evidence Law (ft. Giovanni Tuzet)

The guest for this fourth episode of the HAPL podcast is Giovanni Tuzet, currently Full Professor of Philosophy of Law at Bocconi University (Milan, Italy).

In the first part of this interview with Julieta Rabanos and Bojan Spaić, Tuzet talks about his academic path to the present and introduces the topic of evidential reasoning, starting from the most general question about legal reasoning and moving towards evidential reasoning and evidence law. He analyses the similarities and differences between evidential reasoning and other domains of factual reasoning, and explains different criteria for admissible evidence in law and those other domains. In the second part of the interview, Tuzet discusses his approach to the relation of truth and evidence (developed in his recent book “La prova ragionata”) and its differences with other approaches. The debate goes on to touch admissibility of evidence, evaluation criteria, and standards of proof, evidence and inference, probabilism and control of the inferences, artificial intelligence and evidential reasoning, and much more.

(00:00:00) HAPL Intro

(00:00:18) Introduction – Welcome to Giovanni Tuzet & Academic Genealogy

(00:05:52) A general account of legal reasoning

(00:10:47) Reasoning & Argumentation: public and private aspects of reasoning

(00:13:00) Legal Reasoning & Inferentialism

(00:19:06) Evidential Reasoning in Law and in Other Domains

(00:27:25) ER: Admissibility of Evidence in Law – general concept

(00:33:32) ER: Truth and Evidence in “La prova ragionata” (Giuffre, 2023)

(00:39:54) ER: Admissibility of Evidence in Law – criteria of admissibility and exclusion

(00:46:37) ER: Evidence & Inference (ft. Sherlock Holmes)

(01:01:53) ER: Probabilism & Control of the results of ER

(01:13:58) ER & Artificial Intelligence – limits and possibilities

(01:20:44) ER: Standards of Proof

(01:30:23) ER & Artificial Intelligence – would an AI have convicted OJ Simpson?

(01:35:06) Interview end – Farewell to Giovanni Tuzet

(01:36:58) HAPL Outro

[This episode was hosted by Julieta Rabanos and Bojan Spaić; edited by Bojan Spaić; uploaded and formatted by Julieta Rabanos]