Each month, Attorney Daigle delves into the history of law enforcement, the core principles that have shaped policing from the 20th century to today, and the evolution of the Guardian Mindset.
All content for Guardian Mindset Podcast is the property of Attorney Eric Daigle and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Each month, Attorney Daigle delves into the history of law enforcement, the core principles that have shaped policing from the 20th century to today, and the evolution of the Guardian Mindset.
EPISODE SUMMARY:
Does freedom of speech shield menacing threats? Or does the law have the right to step in when verbal threats instill fear and potential harm? We found ourselves in a labyrinth of these questions in our latest episode, guided by the landmark Supreme Court decision on Counterman versus Colorado. We unwind the intricate layers of defining a threat, especially in this digital age, where threats can be disguised behind the veil of anonymity. We weigh the subjective intent of the speaker against the objective perspective of a reasonable person and question which should hold more weight in legally certifying a threat.
RESOURCES:
Follow DLG on LinkedIn
Follow Attorney Eric Daigle on LinkedIn
Training Built for Supervisors & Command
Perez v. Florida (2017)
Guardian Mindset Podcast
Each month, Attorney Daigle delves into the history of law enforcement, the core principles that have shaped policing from the 20th century to today, and the evolution of the Guardian Mindset.
