Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
History
Music
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/2f/b3/4c/2fb34c4f-a5af-04d5-650c-82d11137c9d9/mza_2777455806714113286.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
go podcast()
Dominic St-Pierre
66 episodes
15 hours ago
15 minutes news, tips, and tricks on the Go programming language.
Show more...
Technology
Education,
How To
RSS
All content for go podcast() is the property of Dominic St-Pierre and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
15 minutes news, tips, and tricks on the Go programming language.
Show more...
Technology
Education,
How To
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/2f/b3/4c/2fb34c4f-a5af-04d5-650c-82d11137c9d9/mza_2777455806714113286.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
062: Your Go linters don't know how to fix your code
go podcast()
20 minutes
1 month ago
062: Your Go linters don't know how to fix your code

One university published attracted my attention, because it was on Go, it's titled: "Assessing Golang Static Analysis Tools on Real-World Issues".
Do you find your static analysis and linters tools could be more helpful when reporting issues?
I'm mixed feeling really, I think that they're pretty damn good. Tools can always improve for sure, not sure if we will need the help of LLMs to mix static analysis checks and LLM analysis / proposed fixes, maybe that will be the next step for those tools.

Links:

  • Paper's link
go podcast()
15 minutes news, tips, and tricks on the Go programming language.