In the season finale of Full Comment, Edward Grange and Danielle Reece-Greenhalgh tackle the mounting pressure on the UK’s criminal justice system.

They begin with the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Hayes & Palombo, a landmark case that casts a spotlight on judicial error and prompts wider questions about systemic failure.

From there, they explore Sir Brian Leveson’s phase one recommendations: proposals aimed at easing the backlog and restoring efficiency without breaking the public purse. Ed and Danielle debate ideas, including a controversial case amnesty, expanded summary offences, and the prospect of judge-only trials. They weigh the benefits of reform against the risks of eroding long-held principles like the right to a jury trial, reflecting on the impact of delay for both victims and defendants.

A thoughtful, at times radical, exploration of what change might look like and whether juries really are sacrosanct.