Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
History
Fiction
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/1f/b0/cf/1fb0cf06-1f77-677c-50c6-275b38dd445d/mza_16781166238813276942.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Free Speech Press
IG: gerardozurvan
83 episodes
1 day ago
I upload United States Supreme Court Oral Arguments so that the average American can listen on their smartphone. I do not modify the audios. Each episode is identical to the MP3 file provided at supremecourt.gov. This podcast has no affiliation with the Supreme Court of the United States.
Show more...
Government
RSS
All content for Free Speech Press is the property of IG: gerardozurvan and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
I upload United States Supreme Court Oral Arguments so that the average American can listen on their smartphone. I do not modify the audios. Each episode is identical to the MP3 file provided at supremecourt.gov. This podcast has no affiliation with the Supreme Court of the United States.
Show more...
Government
https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/42183946/42183946-1728416841022-8b9c4708354af.jpg
Barrett v. United States (2025)
Free Speech Press
1 hour 1 minute 53 seconds
1 month ago
Barrett v. United States (2025)

Docket Number: 24-5774

Decision Below: 102 F.4th 60 (2d Cir. 2024)

Lower Court Case Number: 21-1379

Question Presented

1. Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause permits two sentences for an act that violates 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and§ 924(j), a question that divides seven circuits but about which the Solicitor General and Petitioner agree.

2. Whether "Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under §924(c)(3)(A), a question left open after" United States v. Taylor, 596 U.S. 845 (2022). United States v. Stoney , 62 F.4th 108, 113 (3d Cir. 2023).


Petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to question 1 presented by the petition. Charles L. McCloud, Esquire, of Washington, D.C., is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below.

Cert. Granted March 3, 2025.

See transcript

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-5774_7648.pdf

Free Speech Press
I upload United States Supreme Court Oral Arguments so that the average American can listen on their smartphone. I do not modify the audios. Each episode is identical to the MP3 file provided at supremecourt.gov. This podcast has no affiliation with the Supreme Court of the United States.