Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
Technology
News
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
Podjoint Logo
US
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts211/v4/93/99/b4/9399b472-8310-61f5-fbac-d5f5e06cf77e/mza_11530403006319748223.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Free Speech Arguments
Institute for Free Speech
38 episodes
1 week ago
Presented by the Institute for Free Speech The Free Speech Arguments Podcast brings you oral arguments from important First Amendment free political speech cases across the country.
Show more...
Government
RSS
All content for Free Speech Arguments is the property of Institute for Free Speech and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Presented by the Institute for Free Speech The Free Speech Arguments Podcast brings you oral arguments from important First Amendment free political speech cases across the country.
Show more...
Government
https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/40608779/40608779-1718120136444-3ba54f4209709.jpg
Can States Ban Political Spending by U.S. Companies with Minor Foreign Ownership? (Central Maine Power Company)
Free Speech Arguments
55 minutes
1 year ago
Can States Ban Political Spending by U.S. Companies with Minor Foreign Ownership? (Central Maine Power Company)

Episode 19: Central Maine Power Company, et al. v. Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, et al.

Central Maine Power Company, et al. v. Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, et al., argued before Circuit Judge Lara Montecalvo, Senior Circuit Judge Jeffrey R. Howard, and Circuit Judge Seth Aframe in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on October 9, 2024. Argued by Jonathan Richard Bolton, Maine Assistant Attorney General (on behalf of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, et al.),  Joshua D. Dunlap (on behalf of Central Maine Power Company, et al.), Paul McDonald (on behalf of Versant Power and ENMAX Corporation), and Timothy Woodcock (on behalf of individual voter plaintiffs).

Statement of Issues Presented for Review, from the Brief of Plaintiff—Appellee Enmax Corporation and Versant Power:

1. Whether the district court abused its discretion by preliminarily enjoining enforcement of 21-A M.R.S. § 1064 (the “Act”), which bars all campaign spending of a domestic corporation if 5% or more of its stock is owned by certain foreign entities or such a foreign entity directly or indirectly participates in its campaign-spending decisions, on the grounds that the Act facially violates the corporation’s First Amendment rights.

2. Whether the district court abused its discretion in determining that the Act is expressly preempted by federal law as applied to federal elections when the Act’s plain text does not limit its application to state elections.

3. Whether the district court’s decision enjoining the Act should be affirmed on two alternative grounds left unaddressed by the district court: (i) the Act violates the United States Constitution’s “dormant foreign commerce clause,” Article I, Section 8, Clause 3; and (ii) the Act, as applied to Versant Power, violates its rights under the First Amendment.

Resources:

  • CourtListener case docket for Central Maine Power Company
  • Institute for Free Speech amicus brief

The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the political speech rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government guaranteed by the First Amendment. If you’re enjoying the Free Speech Arguments podcast, please subscribe and leave a review on your preferred podcast platform. To support the Institute’s mission or inquire about legal assistance, please visit our website: www.ifs.org

Free Speech Arguments
Presented by the Institute for Free Speech The Free Speech Arguments Podcast brings you oral arguments from important First Amendment free political speech cases across the country.