Will AI’s ever-evolving reasoning capabilities ever align with human values?
Day by day, AI continues to prove its worth as an integral part of decision-making, content creation, and problem-solving. Because of that, we’re now faced with the question of whether AI can truly understand the world it interacts with, or if it is simply doing a convincing job at identifying and copying patterns in human behavior. Our host, Carter Considine, breaks it down in this episode of Ethical Bytes.
Indeed, some argue that AI could develop internal "world models" that enable it to reason similarly to humans, while others suggest that AI remains a sophisticated mimic of language with no true comprehension.
Melanie Mitchell, a leading AI researcher, discusses the limitations of early AI systems, which often relied on surface-level shortcuts instead of understanding cause and effect. This problem is still relevant today with large language models (LLMs), despite claims from figures like OpenAI’s Ilya Sutskever that these models learn compressed, abstract representations of the world.
Then there are critics, such as Meta's Yann LeCun, who argue that AI still lacks true causal understanding–a key component of human reasoning–and thus can never make true ethical decisions.
Advancements in AI reasoning such as "chain-of-thought" (CoT) prompting improves LLMs’ ability to solve complex problems by guiding them through logical steps. While CoT can help AI produce more reliable results, it doesn't necessarily mean the AI is “reasoning” in a human-like way—it may still just be an advanced form of pattern matching.
Clearly, as AI systems become more capable, the ethical challenges multiply. AI's potential to make decisions based on inferred causal relationships raises questions about accountability, especially when its actions align poorly with human values.
Key Topics:
More info, transcripts, and references can be found at ethical.fm
