The primary source is an article by Enrique Dans that argues against the prohibition of social media for minors, citing studies like EU Kids Online and recommendations from the American Psychological Association (APA) which suggest that digital literacy and education are more effective than outright bans.

The article contends that prohibition is a simplistic political solution that can push young people to less controlled online spaces and leaves them unprepared for the digital world at eighteen.

Dans advocates for stricter regulation on social media platforms themselves, focusing on algorithmic transparency, responsible design, and accountability for executives, while also suggesting that platforms contribute to digital literacy programs.

The accompanying comments from readers offer various perspectives on the issue, discussing the challenges of age verification, the role of parental responsibility, the potential negative impacts on mental health, and contrasting the use of screens with traditional childhood activities.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Banning minors from social networks is a waste of time«