61. Walking away: Investigating the adverse impact of FOMO appeals on FOMO-prone consumers

https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts211/v4/96/47/ce/9647ce65-57e6-02b1-d851-69b290608552/mza_7972712280831409996.jpg/600x600bb.jpg

EEG Investiga

Escola de Economia, Gestão e Ciência Política

75 episodes

2 days ago

O "EEG Investiga" é um podcast da Escola de Economia, Gestão e Ciência Política da Universidade do Minho, dedicado à divulgação científica produzida na escola. Este programa explora investigações atuais, tendências e desafios, com foco na inovação e impacto social.

Social Sciences

Science

RSS

All content for EEG Investiga is the property of Escola de Economia, Gestão e Ciência Política and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

Social Sciences

Science

https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/42428365/42428365-1732632564226-fa7625440dca2.jpg

61. Walking away: Investigating the adverse impact of FOMO appeals on FOMO-prone consumers

EEG Investiga

6 minutes 49 seconds

1 month ago

61. Walking away: Investigating the adverse impact of FOMO appeals on FOMO-prone consumers

Morsi, N., Sá, E., & Silva, J. (2025). Walking away: Investigating the adverse impact of FOMO appeals on FOMO-prone consumers. Business Horizons, 68(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.11.001

This study examines the negative effects of FOMO-based marketing strategies on consumers highly prone to the “fear of missing out.” Drawing on interviews with 57 Egyptian consumers and using the Critical Incident Technique, the research highlights how promotional triggers such as discounts and “buy one, get one free” offers (52.9%) are the most common causes of FOMO-driven purchases, followed by trends (26.4%) and scarcity appeals (20.7%). These stimuli often lead to irrational purchase decisions (95.4%), including impulsive, compulsive, and conformity-based buying. Post-purchase, consumers reported predominantly negative outcomes: cognitive dissatisfaction (75.9%), doubts about judgment, financial stress, and emotional distress, especially guilt, shame, and regret (66.4%). Despite this, half of respondents still intended to repurchase or recommend, showing high vulnerability. The study develops a typology of dissatisfied FOMO consumers—Butterflies, Devotees, Endorsers, and Shopaholics—based on their repurchase and recommendation behavior. Findings stress that while FOMO marketing boosts short-term sales, it risks harming long-term consumer well-being and brand reputation, supporting calls for ethical “well-being marketing.”