Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
History
Education
Technology
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
Loading...
0:00 / 0:00
Podjoint Logo
US
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/4d/9f/7b/4d9f7bcf-5370-0b5d-880b-b575ff9c56b2/mza_7866639753104157349.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Drilled
Critical Frequency
220 episodes
1 week ago
A true-crime podcast about climate change. Reported and hosted by a team of investigative climate journalists, Drilled examines the various obstacles that have kept the world from adequately responding to climate change.
Show more...
Social Sciences
True Crime,
Science,
Earth Sciences
RSS
All content for Drilled is the property of Critical Frequency and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
A true-crime podcast about climate change. Reported and hosted by a team of investigative climate journalists, Drilled examines the various obstacles that have kept the world from adequately responding to climate change.
Show more...
Social Sciences
True Crime,
Science,
Earth Sciences
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/4d/9f/7b/4d9f7bcf-5370-0b5d-880b-b575ff9c56b2/mza_7866639753104157349.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Denial to Delay: The Battle Over the Clean Air Act
Drilled
32 minutes
9 months ago
Denial to Delay: The Battle Over the Clean Air Act
In 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts vs. EPA that when the U.S. Congress passed the Clean Air Act in 1970, climate science was “in its infancy,” implying that government officials could never have intended for the legislation to cover the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. In 2022, SCOTUS doubled down on that idea, ruling in West Virginia v EPA that since the Clean Air Act didn't explicitly talk about climate change, the EPA cannot regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Now, new historical evidence unearthed by a team of Harvard University researchers led by Naomi Oreskes calls the court's understanding of the history of climate science into question, which could have major implications for the government's ability to regulate climate-changing emissions. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Drilled
A true-crime podcast about climate change. Reported and hosted by a team of investigative climate journalists, Drilled examines the various obstacles that have kept the world from adequately responding to climate change.