Dear Listeners,
In this episode your hosts discuss the question of shame.
[0:24] Intro
[3:28] Different kind of shame
[05:47] Guilt and shame
[06:34] Shame by interpretation
[13:19] Did patients change?
[14:33] Shame and defense
[22:08] Perversions
[31:18] The analyst's shame
[44:27] Shame and castration
[46:38] Shame and anger directed at the Institute
[48:05] Shame and hiding
[50:11] More intense for analysts?
[54:38] Shame between students
[57:59] Peer group to counter shame
[01:01:33] Ending
You can follow us on BlueSky:
@discussionsonpsya.bsky.social
We stopped updating our profile on Tweeter/X because we do not want to support the owner of this application, and we encourage you to do the same. We'll maintain the FB page, but nothing else, for the same reasons.
Thank you for listening, and if you like the podcast, give us 5 stars and mention us to your friends and colleagues.
All content for Discussions On Psychoanalysis is the property of Grégoire Pierre & Edgard Danielsen and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Dear Listeners,
In this episode your hosts discuss the question of shame.
[0:24] Intro
[3:28] Different kind of shame
[05:47] Guilt and shame
[06:34] Shame by interpretation
[13:19] Did patients change?
[14:33] Shame and defense
[22:08] Perversions
[31:18] The analyst's shame
[44:27] Shame and castration
[46:38] Shame and anger directed at the Institute
[48:05] Shame and hiding
[50:11] More intense for analysts?
[54:38] Shame between students
[57:59] Peer group to counter shame
[01:01:33] Ending
You can follow us on BlueSky:
@discussionsonpsya.bsky.social
We stopped updating our profile on Tweeter/X because we do not want to support the owner of this application, and we encourage you to do the same. We'll maintain the FB page, but nothing else, for the same reasons.
Thank you for listening, and if you like the podcast, give us 5 stars and mention us to your friends and colleagues.
Dear Listeners,
In this episode, your hosts are discussing different aspects of how we end up trying to justify our presence as clinicians.
[0:22] Intro
[05:49] How do we know if an intervention was needed?
[08:23] The impossibility of case presentation
[11:46] To present to defend (psychoanalysis)?
[14:11] Do we want to be well analyzed?
[19:07] Tension btw what we said and "should have said"
[23:05] To trust the process
[33:37] Anxiety to justify our presence and fees
[36:26] Understandable interventions
Thank you
Share with us your comments or questions directly at
discussionsonpsychoanalysis@pm.me
Twitter twitter.com/DiscusOnPsycha
Facebook www.facebook.com/groups/249668092601494/
SoundCloud @user-296153775
iTunes podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/disc…is/id1454139315
Discussions On Psychoanalysis
Dear Listeners,
In this episode your hosts discuss the question of shame.
[0:24] Intro
[3:28] Different kind of shame
[05:47] Guilt and shame
[06:34] Shame by interpretation
[13:19] Did patients change?
[14:33] Shame and defense
[22:08] Perversions
[31:18] The analyst's shame
[44:27] Shame and castration
[46:38] Shame and anger directed at the Institute
[48:05] Shame and hiding
[50:11] More intense for analysts?
[54:38] Shame between students
[57:59] Peer group to counter shame
[01:01:33] Ending
You can follow us on BlueSky:
@discussionsonpsya.bsky.social
We stopped updating our profile on Tweeter/X because we do not want to support the owner of this application, and we encourage you to do the same. We'll maintain the FB page, but nothing else, for the same reasons.
Thank you for listening, and if you like the podcast, give us 5 stars and mention us to your friends and colleagues.
