Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
Technology
Health & Fitness
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
Podjoint Logo
US
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/04/e1/13/04e113e3-2db3-7acf-b00a-06833e47e069/mza_8140385047182261569.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
DISCORD – Architecture
Rádio Antecâmara | Francisco Moura Veiga
3 episodes
4 months ago
The podcast is a first-person critique talk-show where two architects with distinct takes on how to do good Architecture come together and criticise each others work in a constructive manner. The format is based on the Epistemic Socio-cognitive Conflict Theory (Butera and al.) that shows that there is a strong correlation between engaging in direct constructive criticism around a specific question and the improvement of ones knowledge of both the topic of the question and of the format of the discussion. In other words, openly and frankly discussing each others work leads to better projects and to a healthier architectural culture. There are two basic rules: •⁠ ⁠both should try to answer the overall question of “what could good Architecture be?” •⁠ ⁠In order to structure the discussion each has to send the other 3 elements prior to the discussion: (1) a built project, and (2) unbuilt project (both in photos, images, drawings, and text), and (3) a text of their own authorship. After their discussion, each participant picks someone to take part in the next episode
Show more...
Arts
Society & Culture
RSS
All content for DISCORD – Architecture is the property of Rádio Antecâmara | Francisco Moura Veiga and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The podcast is a first-person critique talk-show where two architects with distinct takes on how to do good Architecture come together and criticise each others work in a constructive manner. The format is based on the Epistemic Socio-cognitive Conflict Theory (Butera and al.) that shows that there is a strong correlation between engaging in direct constructive criticism around a specific question and the improvement of ones knowledge of both the topic of the question and of the format of the discussion. In other words, openly and frankly discussing each others work leads to better projects and to a healthier architectural culture. There are two basic rules: •⁠ ⁠both should try to answer the overall question of “what could good Architecture be?” •⁠ ⁠In order to structure the discussion each has to send the other 3 elements prior to the discussion: (1) a built project, and (2) unbuilt project (both in photos, images, drawings, and text), and (3) a text of their own authorship. After their discussion, each participant picks someone to take part in the next episode
Show more...
Arts
Society & Culture
https://img.transistor.fm/soOZ01vzCJ1p-TsDu0qmaXJvFczr0zgxjT-untl8ksM/rs:fill:3000:3000:1/q:60/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWct/dXBsb2FkLXByb2R1/Y3Rpb24udHJhbnNp/c3Rvci5mbS9hOGIz/YThmMmQ5ZTIyMTQ3/NjNiOTI3OTU2M2U4/MjYzZS5qcGc.jpg
DISCORD – Architecture
DISCORD – Architecture
38 minutes
4 months ago
DISCORD – Architecture

Welcome to the third episode of “DISCORD”, a first-person critique talk-show where two architects with distinct takes on «how to do good Architecture» come together and criticise each others work in a constructive manner.

The introduction to this episode is brilliantly done by Tania Tovar Torres, whose research, critique and curatorial work has been a constant reference for me in the last years.

As you know, the participants in each episode are invited by the participants in the previous one. I could not be happier with the manner in which these lines of guests are evolving: for the third episode, Lanza invited Bangkok Tokyo Architecture and Parabase invited Kosmos Architektur.

The two basic rules for the discussion remain the same:

- Both participants should focus on the overall question of “what could good Architecture be?”

- Each participant has to send the other 3 elements prior to the discussion: (1) a built project, and (2) unbuilt project (both in photos, images, drawings, and text), and (3) a text of their own authorship.

The fourth episode, coming out in September, will feature Sam Chermayeff and Søren Pihlmann.

I hope you enjoy the discussion!

Francisco Moura Veiga

DISCORD – Architecture
The podcast is a first-person critique talk-show where two architects with distinct takes on how to do good Architecture come together and criticise each others work in a constructive manner. The format is based on the Epistemic Socio-cognitive Conflict Theory (Butera and al.) that shows that there is a strong correlation between engaging in direct constructive criticism around a specific question and the improvement of ones knowledge of both the topic of the question and of the format of the discussion. In other words, openly and frankly discussing each others work leads to better projects and to a healthier architectural culture. There are two basic rules: •⁠ ⁠both should try to answer the overall question of “what could good Architecture be?” •⁠ ⁠In order to structure the discussion each has to send the other 3 elements prior to the discussion: (1) a built project, and (2) unbuilt project (both in photos, images, drawings, and text), and (3) a text of their own authorship. After their discussion, each participant picks someone to take part in the next episode