Listeners, this week’s headline out of Washington: the Department of Justice is grappling with the shockwaves from the so-called “Thursday Night Massacre,” where seven prosecutors resigned in protest after the DOJ dismissed federal corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. That fallout has drawn comparisons to the famed Saturday Night Massacre of Watergate. Acting U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon claims the move was a quid pro quo, sparking major concerns about the department’s independence and the fundamental promise of equal justice. Public scrutiny is intense, and the implications for DOJ credibility and US rule of law are far-reaching.

But the DOJ hasn’t stopped moving. On May 12th, the department rolled out new priorities for prosecuting white-collar crime, marking a significant shift in policy. In a letter from Criminal Division Chief Matthew Galeotti, prosecutors are now urged to “strike an appropriate balance,” focusing not just on rooting out corporate wrongdoing but also on minimizing unnecessary burdens on American businesses. Galeotti put it plainly: “Overbroad and unchecked enforcement burdens U.S. businesses and harms U.S. interests.” For companies, that means more opportunities for leniency in cases of cooperation and self-disclosure, alternatives to prosecution, and faster resolutions. The DOJ announced it will appoint compliance monitors only in the most necessary circumstances, emphasizing efficiency and fairness in enforcement.

These changes matter for corporate America and workers across the country. The DOJ’s Whistleblower Pilot Program, now in its second year, is incentivizing employees to report corporate misconduct by offering financial rewards for information that leads to criminal or civil forfeiture. Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri told an audience at NYU’s Program on Corporate Compliance, “companies play a critical role as the first line of defense against corporate crime.” She assured whistleblowers that their identities would be protected and warned companies that retaliation could mean losing credit for cooperation and even facing obstruction of justice charges.

The new DOJ policies signal a more business-friendly climate but raise questions for consumer advocates, state and local governments, and international partners. Project 2025 proposes substantial changes that would allow DOJ to charge or remove local prosecutors who don’t align with federal “law and order” directives—potentially undermining local policy priorities like diversion for low-level drug offenders. This federal-local tension is worth watching.

Internationally, enforcement shifts—especially around anti-bribery actions—are sparking concern. With the President’s executive order to pause FCPA enforcement and DOJ narrowing its focus to cartel-linked bribery, foreign governments and multinational businesses are adjusting rapidly. The U.K.’s Serious Fraud Office is ramping up its own cross-Atlantic task forces and partnerships to tackle grand corruption.

For American citizens, this all shapes the climate for public trust, workplace protections, and access to justice. For businesses, it means sharper incentives for compliance and self-policing—with real financial and legal risks. For local and state governments, the federal presence in law enforcement may grow, and decision-making power could shift. Globally, these DOJ moves will influence diplomatic and regulatory relationships for months to come.

Listeners, watch for upcoming Congressional hearings on the DOJ resignations, deadlines for whistleblower submissions, and new DOJ guidance rolling out in October. For more, visit the DOJ’s website or check out industry alerts from key law firms and the Brennan Center. If you’ve got a stake in these issues or want your voice heard, DOJ is also accepting public comments on its proposed enforcement policies.

Thanks...