Can discredited forensic science send innocent people to death row?Texas was the first state to pass a law—known as the Junk Science Law (Article 11.073)—giving prisoners a chance to challenge their convictions when the science used against them has since been debunked. But more than a decade later, is the law actually helping?
In this episode of Death Row Stories, we speak with Estelle Hebron-Jones, Attorney and Director of Special Projects at the Texas Defender Service. She explains how Texas courts are dealing with death penalty cases involving outdated, flawed, or unreliable science. We explore infamous cases like Cameron Todd Willingham, Rodney Reed, Robert Roberson, and DeMontreal Miller—some based on fire myths, others on shaken baby syndrome or changing expert opinions.
Despite the law’s promise, many claims are still denied—not on the facts, but because of procedural barriers, legal technicalities, or the reluctance of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA). Estelle reveals why the system often blocks relief, even when innocence is plausible—and how lawmakers are now pushing for reform.
Listen now to discover what happens when science fails in the courtroom—and whether justice can still be served.
You can also discover our show on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@Death-Row-Stories
Email me at: cultureaventure@gmail.com
