When I see posts about AI’s immense power, I have one thought: It's no me, no AI. This isn't a threat to the machines. It's a demand for human agency. For years, we've been operating under the "live plug"—a system where AI scrapes our unproductized data, our insights, and our expertise without consent or compensation . They do this because they can, and because for them, our scattered thoughts are just free training data. Why would an AI company give credit for an asset that has no structure, no owner, and no clear value? The uncomfortable truth is this: Your value is evaporating. But it doesn't have to be this way. The Productisation Imperative is the solution. It's the philosophical, economic, and strategic blueprint for a future where every human's unique EEAT (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness) is a protected, monetizable asset. We are announcing the launch of the #No_me_No_AI_Movement. Coming soon, we’ll be launching a full campaign to help you: Understand the "unaddressed economic void" in the AI era. Reclaim your narrative from AI and social media. Learn how to structure your unique EEAT into a product that machines need and will pay for. This movement is a wake-up call and a call to action. We’re going to prove that humans can and will shape AI and control their share of its intelligence. So, here's my poll for the week. The question is simple, but its implications are profound. AI companies won't give credit for your unproductised data, and you'll get nothing back for it. So, which do you choose? | Just give it away anyways | | Own your stuff and make them pay for it | #ProductisationImperative #No_me_NoAI #EEATEngineering #DigitalSurvivalPartner #AI An initiative of Donald Adeniji