In the early days of the Hollywood studio system, producers exerted far greater creative control than any individual director. Then, in the mid-twentieth century, a group of young French critics issued a cri du coeur that gave rise to the figure of the auteur: visionary filmmakers ranging from Jean-Luc Godard to Martin Scorsese and Wes Anderson. In the final installment of this year’s Critics at Large interview series, Vinson Cunningham talks with fellow staff writer Richard Brody about the origins of auteur theory, and about the lengths to which directors have gone for artistic freedom in the decades since. They take Spike Lee’s body of work as a case study, considering his new movie “Highest 2 Lowest” and how his filmmaking sensibility reflects his singular view of the world. “Style is a funny thing in movies,” Brody says. “If it’s any good, it’s not inseparable from substance. It is substance.” Read, watch, and listen with the critics: “The 400 Blows” (1959) “Breathless” (1960) “Notes on the Auteur Theory in 1962,” by Andrew Sarris (Film Culture) “Circles and Squares,” by Pauline Kael (Film Quarterly) “Martin Scorsese on Making ‘Killers of the Flower Moon,’ ” by Richard Brody (The New Yorker) “The Wolf of Wall Street” (2013) “Spike Lee Comes Home,” by Richard Brody (The New Yorker) “Da Sweet Blood of Jesus” (2014) “Red Hook Summer” (2012) “A Great Film Reveals Itself in Five Minutes,” by Richard Brody (The New Yorker) “Highest 2 Lowest” (2025) “ ‘Highest 2 Lowest’ Marks a Conservative Pivot for Spike Lee,” by Richard Brody (The New Yorker) “Do the Right Thing” (1989) New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts.