All content for Crime and Punishment of Ancient Rome and Greece is the property of Maitt Saiwyer and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
While the Athenians were famously litigious, they also recognized that a formal public trial was not always the best way to resolve a dispute. For many private conflicts, they turned to arbitration. Arbitration was a less formal, less costly, and often faster way to find a just resolution, and it was a deeply embedded part of the Athenian legal culture.
This episode explores the ancient practice of arbitration. We distinguish between private arbitration, where the two parties would agree on a trusted individual to be their judge, and public arbitration, a mandatory first step for most private lawsuits in 4th-century Athens. We examine the duties of the public arbitrators—citizens over the age of 59—who would hear the evidence and propose a settlement. If either party rejected the arbitrator's decision, the case would then proceed to a jury trial.
Arbitration was a crucial element of the Athenian justice system, helping to filter out cases and encourage peaceful settlement. It shows a legal culture that, for all its love of courtroom drama, also valued compromise and mediation. It was a pragmatic recognition that not every dispute required a massive public spectacle.