In this episode of Communication Breakdown, Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll dissect activist investor Elliott Management’s $4 billion stake in PepsiCo — and the rival business plan they rolled out to reframe the company’s strategy. The hosts analyze how activists weaponize contradictions, use timing to hijack the news cycle, and tell Pepsi’s story better than Pepsi itself. They also look at Harvard’s restraint in the face of a legal victory over the Trump administration, and the reputational freefall of a Polish CEO who sparked global outrage by snatching a souvenir hat from a child at the US Open. Together, the cases highlight the stakes for communicators in reclaiming narrative control and protecting credibility under fire.
Takeaways- Activist investors often compete through narrative, not just capital.
- Shadow strategies succeed by simplifying contradictions companies ignore.
- Preempting reputational fault lines is more effective than defending them later.
Topics Mentioned
activist investors, shadow strategy, corporate contradictions, credibility, transparency, restraint strategy, reputation risk, viral outrage, apologies, narrative control, crisis management
Companies Mentioned
Nestlé, PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, Starbucks, Southwest Airlines, Harvard University, Trump Administration, DrogbrookEpisode
Hashtags
#Nestlé #PepsiCo #CocaCola #Starbucks #SouthwestAirlines #Harvard #TrumpAdministration #Drogbrook #CorporateCommunications #CrisisManagement #Reputation #PublicRelations #Leadership #NarrativeControl #StakeholderTrust #Apologies #MediaRelations #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetwork
CreditsProduced by
AdvoCast for the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.
Connect with us: podcast@ocrnetwork.com • LinkedIn: Observatory on Corporate Reputation
