Welcome to Bird Flu Intel: Facts, Not Fear, on H5N1—a special myth-busting edition, built to help you separate scientific reality from internet rumor.

Today, misinformation about H5N1 bird flu travels as fast as the virus itself. Let’s break down three of the most common myths, deliver evidence-based corrections, and empower you to discern credible information in a sea of noise.

Myth #1: H5N1 is spreading easily from person to person and a human pandemic is inevitable.
The best available evidence contradicts this. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as of mid-2025, nearly all human H5N1 infections globally, including recent US cases, occurred following direct contact with infected animals—most commonly poultry or, more recently, dairy cattle. Both CDC and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control state that no sustained human-to-human transmission has been documented. Isolated cases and rare clusters have been tracked closely and are traced to animal exposure, not to person-to-person spread.

Myth #2: If you drink pasteurized milk or eat properly cooked poultry, you can catch H5N1.
Translation: This is false. Pasteurization—the standard process for treating milk—eliminates the virus. The US Department of Agriculture found no live H5N1 virus in milk sold in stores due to this process. Properly cooked poultry is also safe, as thorough cooking destroys the virus, according to World Health Organization guidance.

Myth #3: All human H5N1 infections are severe or fatal.
False again. Review articles and CDC surveillance have found that most cases in 2025 have been mild, including people who never felt sick but developed antibodies—a sign the body fought off the virus unnoticed. There have been deaths from H5N1, typically in people with extensive direct contact with infected animals, but the overall illness profile is more mild and diverse than earlier outbreaks.

Let’s tackle how misinformation spreads. Bird flu rumors travel quickly through social media, text chains, and headline-chasing news. Some amplify fears by misrepresenting isolated cases, while others mistake animal outbreaks for imminent human risk. Incomplete or outdated statistics also stoke confusion. Misinformation is dangerous, leading to stigma, inappropriate panic, unnecessary supply shortages, and sometimes even dangerous self-treatment or avoidance of safe food.

So how can you critically evaluate bird flu claims?
- Check if the information comes from reputable sources like the CDC, WHO, or national health departments.
- Avoid sharing stories without clear evidence or scientific backing.
- Beware of sensational headlines—dig deeper and look for multiple expert opinions.
- Take note if guidance has been recently updated as the science evolves.

The current scientific consensus is that H5N1 poses a real but currently low risk to the general public. Direct contact with infected animals remains the primary route of transmission. The virus’s jump into mammals—including dairy cattle, cats, and even a pig—is being closely monitored because viruses can evolve unpredictably. Scientists agree on the need for robust surveillance, transparent reporting, and rapid sharing of information as the situation changes.

Areas of legitimate uncertainty remain. Key questions include: Could the virus adapt to transmit more readily between people? Will ongoing animal outbreaks change its risk profile? What are the implications of finding mild or silent infections?

Thank you for tuning in to Bird Flu Intel: Facts, Not Fear, on H5N1. Remember, informed minds beat fear every time. Come back next week for more calm, clear, science-first updates. This has been a Quiet Please production. For more, check out Quiet Please Dot A I.

For more Back to Episodes