Bingeworthy is a podcast about deciding what shows are worthy of wasting your valuable time watching episode after episode of. Each week a group of our expert panelist gather and discuss a show and make this crucial assessment. Here is how it works:
Each panelist comes to the podcast with a selection of a show and one episode from it. From the strength of that one episode, the group must decide if that show is indeed Bingeworthy.
The show is divided into 2 segments:
Introduction and episode selection
Episode review and voting
In the first segment, we introduce our panelist and bs about what is going on in their lives, to build some level of report, real or not. Then, one panelist is chosen at random to pick this weeks episode for review. They must then make their argument as to why this show is Bingeworthy. They can give a general overview of the show but cannot get too specific or discuss overarching plots at this point. Remember, the vote is based on this one episode alone.
The show takes a brief break to watch the episode before segment two begins.
In segment two, everyone breaks down every single detail about the show. The panelists can ask whatever questions they want and the chooser can answer as they so choose as long as their explanation does not give away any major spoilers. This can also get very ugly as everyone is free to tear the episode apart or praise it and argue with everyone who doesn’t agree with their opinion.
After the bickering and overly-deep analysis, all the panelist vote yes or no, is the show Bingeworthy? If the decision is unanimously yes, the voting is over, the show is added to the official Bingeworthy list and the show is no longer eligible for future episodes. If there is one or more no votes, the picker, as well as the yes votes, have a chance to change the other’s minds. Then there is one more round of voting. If a unanimous decision cannot be reached, the show is not added to the list and any panelist is free to bring another episode to a future podcast to try and convince everyone again.
All content for Bingeworthy is the property of Drive to Ants and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Bingeworthy is a podcast about deciding what shows are worthy of wasting your valuable time watching episode after episode of. Each week a group of our expert panelist gather and discuss a show and make this crucial assessment. Here is how it works:
Each panelist comes to the podcast with a selection of a show and one episode from it. From the strength of that one episode, the group must decide if that show is indeed Bingeworthy.
The show is divided into 2 segments:
Introduction and episode selection
Episode review and voting
In the first segment, we introduce our panelist and bs about what is going on in their lives, to build some level of report, real or not. Then, one panelist is chosen at random to pick this weeks episode for review. They must then make their argument as to why this show is Bingeworthy. They can give a general overview of the show but cannot get too specific or discuss overarching plots at this point. Remember, the vote is based on this one episode alone.
The show takes a brief break to watch the episode before segment two begins.
In segment two, everyone breaks down every single detail about the show. The panelists can ask whatever questions they want and the chooser can answer as they so choose as long as their explanation does not give away any major spoilers. This can also get very ugly as everyone is free to tear the episode apart or praise it and argue with everyone who doesn’t agree with their opinion.
After the bickering and overly-deep analysis, all the panelist vote yes or no, is the show Bingeworthy? If the decision is unanimously yes, the voting is over, the show is added to the official Bingeworthy list and the show is no longer eligible for future episodes. If there is one or more no votes, the picker, as well as the yes votes, have a chance to change the other’s minds. Then there is one more round of voting. If a unanimous decision cannot be reached, the show is not added to the list and any panelist is free to bring another episode to a future podcast to try and convince everyone again.
For some reason, Matt thought this show was very appropriate for the current time.
AI Show notes:
The conversation delves into the world of Magic: The Gathering, discussing a recent cheating scandal that has stirred controversy within the community. The participants share their thoughts on the implications of cheating in competitive play, the dynamics of the Magic community, and the role of influencers in gaming culture. They also touch on nostalgia related to gaming and the impact of popular figures like Ninja on the gaming landscape. In this lively conversation, the hosts navigate through various themes, including the darker aspects of life such as depression and cheating, while also celebrating new beginnings with job announcements. They delve into nostalgic television shows, humorous medical quirks, and the iconic action star Jason Statham. The discussion also touches on the impact of cheat codes in gaming and the dynamics of playing games with younger generations, all wrapped in a light-hearted and humorous tone. The conversation explores various themes, starting with humor and jokes, transitioning into discussions about show choices and the dynamics of games. The focus then shifts to the pilot episode of ‘The Newsroom’, where participants reflect on the writing quality, character dynamics, and the overall impact of the show. The dialogue highlights the attention to detail in storytelling and the relatability of characters, culminating in a rich analysis of the show’s strengths and weaknesses. In this conversation, the participants delve into the intricacies of character development, particularly focusing on the flaws and depth of the characters in a specific show. They discuss the quality of writing and how it contributes to the overall cohesion of the narrative. The impact of news media and its representation in the show is also a significant theme, alongside character development and future implications for the storyline. The conversation concludes with final thoughts and ratings, emphasizing the show’s strengths and areas for improvement. In this conversation, the speakers delve into various pressing topics, including the implications of the rise of Red Note, a platform controlled by the Chinese government, and the ongoing debate surrounding the TikTok ban in the U.S. They discuss the complexities of tech mogul Elon Musk and his impact on society, as well as recent medical breakthroughs that offer hope for diabetes and cancer treatments. The conversation concludes with a humorous exchange, highlighting the importance of laughter amidst serious discussions.
Newsroom is available on Max.
Bingeworthy
Bingeworthy is a podcast about deciding what shows are worthy of wasting your valuable time watching episode after episode of. Each week a group of our expert panelist gather and discuss a show and make this crucial assessment. Here is how it works:
Each panelist comes to the podcast with a selection of a show and one episode from it. From the strength of that one episode, the group must decide if that show is indeed Bingeworthy.
The show is divided into 2 segments:
Introduction and episode selection
Episode review and voting
In the first segment, we introduce our panelist and bs about what is going on in their lives, to build some level of report, real or not. Then, one panelist is chosen at random to pick this weeks episode for review. They must then make their argument as to why this show is Bingeworthy. They can give a general overview of the show but cannot get too specific or discuss overarching plots at this point. Remember, the vote is based on this one episode alone.
The show takes a brief break to watch the episode before segment two begins.
In segment two, everyone breaks down every single detail about the show. The panelists can ask whatever questions they want and the chooser can answer as they so choose as long as their explanation does not give away any major spoilers. This can also get very ugly as everyone is free to tear the episode apart or praise it and argue with everyone who doesn’t agree with their opinion.
After the bickering and overly-deep analysis, all the panelist vote yes or no, is the show Bingeworthy? If the decision is unanimously yes, the voting is over, the show is added to the official Bingeworthy list and the show is no longer eligible for future episodes. If there is one or more no votes, the picker, as well as the yes votes, have a chance to change the other’s minds. Then there is one more round of voting. If a unanimous decision cannot be reached, the show is not added to the list and any panelist is free to bring another episode to a future podcast to try and convince everyone again.
