Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Since its inception in 2001, Red Bull Rampage has demanded athletes walk a fine line between risk and reward, and the unfortunate injuries that go with that have been numerous. But with four riders heli-evac’d with serious injuries, this year’s Rampage was arguably the heaviest we’ve seen, and has left us with many questions about how, and if, the event should continue.
Shortly afterward, several of our reviewers weighed in with their thoughts in our “Debatable” series, which asked the question, “should Rampage be shut down?” Today, we continue that conversation with an open (and quite passionate) discussion on what we think needs to happen to make the event safer for the athletes, more transparent to the fans, and ideally better to watch, too.
RELATED LINKS:
Debatable: Should Rampage Be Shut Down
Blister Mountain Bike Buyer’s Guide
Get Our Free Newsletter & Gear Giveaways
TOPICS & TIMES:
Xan: The Venue (1:07)
Dylan: Let the Athletes Course Correct (11:04)
Simon: On-Site Medical Assessments (19:09)
Zack: Expand the Event (28:34)
David: Make it a Jam instead of a Comp (35:58)
Jonathan: Increase Transparency, Cover Athletes (46:27)
The Athlete's Decision (55:12)
Our Consensus: Changes for Next Year (1:01:29)
CHECK OUT OUR OTHER PODCASTS:
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.