Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
Technology
Health & Fitness
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
Podjoint Logo
US
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts116/v4/7d/99/95/7d9995f1-5dda-275d-bb3b-5e40487edcae/mza_14557612312488355422.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
Attacking Faulty Reasoning
WEHC
1 episodes
8 months ago
In this podcast, professors of philosophy Ed Damer and Taylor Stone offer a practical guide to becoming a better critical thinker by learning how to recognize the flaws in one's own arguments and the arguments of others. They discuss the five criteria that a good argument must meet, and show how fallacious arguments fail to meet this standard.
Show more...
Philosophy
Education,
Society & Culture,
How To,
Self-Improvement
RSS
All content for Attacking Faulty Reasoning is the property of WEHC and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
In this podcast, professors of philosophy Ed Damer and Taylor Stone offer a practical guide to becoming a better critical thinker by learning how to recognize the flaws in one's own arguments and the arguments of others. They discuss the five criteria that a good argument must meet, and show how fallacious arguments fail to meet this standard.
Show more...
Philosophy
Education,
Society & Culture,
How To,
Self-Improvement
https://artwork.captivate.fm/d4252c75-c3f4-4935-abaf-7951d9cca7b8/0ruJzG7TVjhI-rOT97tKkgGw.jpg
Fallibility and Truth-Seeking ep.1
Attacking Faulty Reasoning
28 minutes 58 seconds
2 years ago
Fallibility and Truth-Seeking ep.1
Attacking Faulty Reasoning
In this podcast, professors of philosophy Ed Damer and Taylor Stone offer a practical guide to becoming a better critical thinker by learning how to recognize the flaws in one's own arguments and the arguments of others. They discuss the five criteria that a good argument must meet, and show how fallacious arguments fail to meet this standard.