Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
Technology
Health & Fitness
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
Podjoint Logo
US
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts116/v4/73/4f/b0/734fb0d2-c6ea-058b-497b-7e17db51602f/mza_10213173941639892174.png/600x600bb.jpg
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.GA and astro-ph.CO
Corentin Cadiou
594 episodes
4 weeks ago
Large Field Polynomial Inflation: Parameter Space, Predictions and Double Eternal Nature by Manuel Drees et al. on Monday 21 November Simple monomial inflationary scenarios have been ruled out by recent observations. In this work we revisit the next simplest scenario, a single--field model where the scalar potential is a polynomial of degree four which features a concave ``almost'' saddle point. We focus on trans--Planckian field values. We reparametrize the potential, which greatly simplifies the procedure for finding acceptbale model parameters. This allows for the first comprehensive scan of parameter space consistent with recent Planck and BICEP/Keck 2018 measurements. Even for trans--Planckian field values the tensor--to--scalar ratio $r$ can be as small as $\mathcal{O}(10^{-8})$, but the model can also saturate the current upper bound. In contrast to the small--field version of this model, radiative stability does not lead to strong constraints on the parameters of the inflaton potential. For very large field values the potential can be approximated by the quartic term; as well known, this allows eternal inflation even for field energy well below the reduced Planck mass $M_{\rm Pl}$, with Hubble parameter $H \sim 10^{-2} M_{\rm Pl}$. More interestingly, we find a region of parameter space that even supports {\em two phases of eternal inflation}. The second epoch only occurs if the slope at the would--be saddle point is very small, and has $H \sim 10^{-5} M_{\rm Pl}$; it can only be realized if $r \sim 10^{-2}$, within the sensitivity range of next--generation CMB observations. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07545v2
Show more...
Natural Sciences
Science
RSS
All content for Astro arXiv | astro-ph.GA and astro-ph.CO is the property of Corentin Cadiou and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
Large Field Polynomial Inflation: Parameter Space, Predictions and Double Eternal Nature by Manuel Drees et al. on Monday 21 November Simple monomial inflationary scenarios have been ruled out by recent observations. In this work we revisit the next simplest scenario, a single--field model where the scalar potential is a polynomial of degree four which features a concave ``almost'' saddle point. We focus on trans--Planckian field values. We reparametrize the potential, which greatly simplifies the procedure for finding acceptbale model parameters. This allows for the first comprehensive scan of parameter space consistent with recent Planck and BICEP/Keck 2018 measurements. Even for trans--Planckian field values the tensor--to--scalar ratio $r$ can be as small as $\mathcal{O}(10^{-8})$, but the model can also saturate the current upper bound. In contrast to the small--field version of this model, radiative stability does not lead to strong constraints on the parameters of the inflaton potential. For very large field values the potential can be approximated by the quartic term; as well known, this allows eternal inflation even for field energy well below the reduced Planck mass $M_{\rm Pl}$, with Hubble parameter $H \sim 10^{-2} M_{\rm Pl}$. More interestingly, we find a region of parameter space that even supports {\em two phases of eternal inflation}. The second epoch only occurs if the slope at the would--be saddle point is very small, and has $H \sim 10^{-5} M_{\rm Pl}$; it can only be realized if $r \sim 10^{-2}$, within the sensitivity range of next--generation CMB observations. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07545v2
Show more...
Natural Sciences
Science
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts116/v4/73/4f/b0/734fb0d2-c6ea-058b-497b-7e17db51602f/mza_10213173941639892174.png/600x600bb.jpg
The Dark Energy Survey Year 3 high redshift sample: Selection, characterization and analysis of galaxy clustering
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.GA and astro-ph.CO
2 years ago
The Dark Energy Survey Year 3 high redshift sample: Selection, characterization and analysis of galaxy clustering
The Dark Energy Survey Year 3 high redshift sample: Selection, characterization and analysis of galaxy clustering by C. Sánchez et al. on Wednesday 30 November The fiducial cosmological analyses of imaging galaxy surveys like the Dark Energy Survey (DES) typically probe the Universe at redshifts $z < 1$. This is mainly because of the limited depth of these surveys, and also because such analyses rely heavily on galaxy lensing, which is more efficient at low redshifts. In this work we present the selection and characterization of high-redshift galaxy samples using DES Year 3 data, and the analysis of their galaxy clustering measurements. In particular, we use galaxies that are fainter than those used in the previous DES Year 3 analyses and a Bayesian redshift scheme to define three tomographic bins with mean redshifts around $z \sim 0.9$, $1.2$ and $1.5$, which significantly extend the redshift coverage of the fiducial DES Year 3 analysis. These samples contain a total of about 9 million galaxies, and their galaxy density is more than 2 times higher than those in the DES Year 3 fiducial case. We characterize the redshift uncertainties of the samples, including the usage of various spectroscopic and high-quality redshift samples, and we develop a machine-learning method to correct for correlations between galaxy density and survey observing conditions. The analysis of galaxy clustering measurements, with a total signal-to-noise $S/N \sim 70$ after scale cuts, yields robust cosmological constraints on a combination of the fraction of matter in the Universe $\Omega_m$ and the Hubble parameter $h$, $\Omega_m = 0.195^{+0.023}_{-0.018}$, and 2-3% measurements of the amplitude of the galaxy clustering signals, probing galaxy bias and the amplitude of matter fluctuations, $b \sigma_8$. A companion paper $\textit{(in preparation)}$ will present the cross-correlations of these high-$z$ samples with CMB lensing from Planck and SPT, and the cosmological analysis of those measurements in combination with the galaxy clustering presented in this work. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16593v1
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.GA and astro-ph.CO
Large Field Polynomial Inflation: Parameter Space, Predictions and Double Eternal Nature by Manuel Drees et al. on Monday 21 November Simple monomial inflationary scenarios have been ruled out by recent observations. In this work we revisit the next simplest scenario, a single--field model where the scalar potential is a polynomial of degree four which features a concave ``almost'' saddle point. We focus on trans--Planckian field values. We reparametrize the potential, which greatly simplifies the procedure for finding acceptbale model parameters. This allows for the first comprehensive scan of parameter space consistent with recent Planck and BICEP/Keck 2018 measurements. Even for trans--Planckian field values the tensor--to--scalar ratio $r$ can be as small as $\mathcal{O}(10^{-8})$, but the model can also saturate the current upper bound. In contrast to the small--field version of this model, radiative stability does not lead to strong constraints on the parameters of the inflaton potential. For very large field values the potential can be approximated by the quartic term; as well known, this allows eternal inflation even for field energy well below the reduced Planck mass $M_{\rm Pl}$, with Hubble parameter $H \sim 10^{-2} M_{\rm Pl}$. More interestingly, we find a region of parameter space that even supports {\em two phases of eternal inflation}. The second epoch only occurs if the slope at the would--be saddle point is very small, and has $H \sim 10^{-5} M_{\rm Pl}$; it can only be realized if $r \sim 10^{-2}$, within the sensitivity range of next--generation CMB observations. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07545v2