The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
All content for Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP is the property of Corentin Cadiou and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
Simultaneous gas accretion onto a pair of giant planets: Impact on their final mass and on the protoplanetary disk structure
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
2 years ago
Simultaneous gas accretion onto a pair of giant planets: Impact on their final mass and on the protoplanetary disk structure
Simultaneous gas accretion onto a pair of giant planets: Impact on their final mass and on the protoplanetary disk structure by Camille Bergez-Casalou et al. on Wednesday 30 November
Several planetary systems are known to host multiple giant planets. However,
when two giant planets are accreting from the same disk, it is unclear what
effect the presence of the second planet has on the gas accretion process of
both planets. In this paper we perform long-term 2D isothermal hydrodynamical
simulations (over more than 0.5 Myrs) with the FARGO-2D1D code, considering two
non-migrating planets accreting from the same gaseous disk. We find that the
evolution of the planets' mass ratio depends on gap formation. However, in all
cases, when the planets start accreting at the same time, they end up with very
similar masses (0.9 $
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
