The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
All content for Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP is the property of Corentin Cadiou and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
Observations of planetary winds and outflows by Leonardo A. Dos Santos. on Wednesday 30 November
We have recently hit the milestone of 5,000 exoplanets discovered. In stark
contrast with the Solar System, most of the exoplanets we know to date orbit
extremely close to their host stars, causing them to lose copious amounts of
gas through atmospheric escape at some stage in their lives. In some planets,
this process can be so dramatic that they shrink in timescales of a few million
to billions of years, imprinting features in the demographics of transiting
exoplanets. Depending on the transit geometry, ionizing conditions, and
atmospheric properties, a planetary outflow can be observed using transmission
spectroscopy in the ultraviolet, optical or near-infrared. In this review, we
will discuss the main techniques to observe evaporating exoplanets and their
results. To date, we have evidence that at least 28 exoplanets are currently
losing their atmospheres, and the literature has reported at least 42
non-detections.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16243v1
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
