The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
All content for Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP is the property of Corentin Cadiou and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
Modeling the Evolution of Silicate Volatile Accretion Discs around White Dwarfs
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
2 years ago
Modeling the Evolution of Silicate Volatile Accretion Discs around White Dwarfs
Modeling the Evolution of Silicate Volatile Accretion Discs around White Dwarfs by Ayaka Okuya et al. on Wednesday 30 November
A growing number of debris discs have been detected around metal-polluted
white dwarfs. They are thought to be originated from tidally disrupted
exoplanetary bodies and responsible for metal accretion onto host WDs. To
explain (1) the observationally inferred accretion rate higher than that
induced by Poynting-Robertson drag, $\dot{M}_{\rm PR}$, and (2) refractory-rich
photosphere composition indicating the accretion of terrestrial rocky
materials, previous studies proposed runaway accretion of silicate particles
due to gas drag by the increasing silicate vapor produced by the sublimation of
the particles. Because re-condensation of the vapor diffused beyond the
sublimation line was neglected, we revisit this problem by one-dimensional
advection/diffusion simulation that consistently incorporates silicate
sublimation/condensation and back-reaction to particle drift due to gas drag in
the solid-rich disc. We find that the silicate vapor density in the region
overlapping the solid particles follows the saturating vapor pressure and that
no runaway accretion occurs if the re-condensation is included. This always
limits the accretion rate from mono-compositional silicate discs to
$\dot{M}_{\rm PR}$ in the equilibrium state. Alternatively, by performing
additional simulations that couple the volatile gas (e.g., water vapor), we
demonstrate that the volatile gas enhances the silicate accretion to
$>\dot{M}_{\rm PR}$ through gas drag. The refractory-rich accretion is
simultaneously reproduced when the initial volatile fraction of disc is
$\lesssim 10$ wt\% because of the suppression of volatile accretion due to the
efficient back-reaction of solid to gas. The discs originating from C-type
asteroid analogs might be a possible clue to the high-$\dot{M}$ puzzle.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16797v1
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
