The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
All content for Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP is the property of Corentin Cadiou and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
Forming equal mass planetary binaries by pebble accretion
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
1 minute
2 years ago
Forming equal mass planetary binaries by pebble accretion
Forming equal mass planetary binaries by pebble accretion by T. J. Konijn et al. on Wednesday 30 November
Binary solar system objects are common and range from satellite systems with
very large mass ratios $M_1/M_2$ to mass ratios very close to unity. A
well-known example of a binary is the Pluto-Charon system. With Charon only
eight times less massive than Pluto the question arises as for many other
systems, why the mass-ratio is still close to unity. There is much evidence
that (binary) planet(esimal) formation happened early, when the protoplanetary
gas disk was still around. It is likely that (some of) these binaries grew up
together subject to pebble accretion. Here we focus on the question of how the
mass arriving in the gravitational influence zone of the binary during pebble
accretion, is distributed over the binary components. Does the accretion
through time lead to a converging mass ratio, or to a diverging mass ratio? We
numerically integrate pebble paths in the same well-known fashion as for a
single mass subject to pebble accretion and track what the efficiency of
accretion is for the two separate binary components, compared to a single body
with the same mass. These numerical simulations are done for a range of binary
mass-ratios, mutual separations, Stokes numbers and two orbital distances, 2.5
and 39 au. We find that in the limit where pebbles start to spiral around the
primary (this holds for relatively large pebbles), the pebble preferentially
collides with the secondary, causing the mass ratio to converge towards unity
on Myr timescales. In this regime the total sweep-up efficiency can lower to
half that of a pebble-accreting single body because pebbles that are thrown out
of the system, after close encounters with the system. The results show that
systems such as Pluto-Charon and other larger equal mass binaries could well
have co-accreted by means of pebble accretion in the disk phase without
producing binaries with highly diverging mass-ratios.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16083v1
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
