The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
All content for Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP is the property of Corentin Cadiou and is served directly from their servers
with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
Determination of 1929 Asteroid Rotation Periods from WISE Data
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
2 years ago
Determination of 1929 Asteroid Rotation Periods from WISE Data
Determination of 1929 Asteroid Rotation Periods from WISE Data by Adrian L. H. Lam et al. on Wednesday 30 November
We used 22 $\mu$m (W4) Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE)
observations of 4420 asteroids to analyze lightcurves and determined spin
period estimates for 1929 asteroids. We fit second-order Fourier models at a
large number of trial frequencies to the W4 data and analyzed the resulting
periodograms. We initially excluded rotational frequencies exceeding 7.57
rotations per day (P < 3.17 hr), which are not sampled adequately by WISE, and
periods that exceed twice the WISE observation interval, which is typically 36
hr. Three solutions accurately capture the vast majority of the rotational
frequencies in our sample: the best-fit frequency and its mirrors around 3.78
and 7.57 rotations per day. By comparing our solutions to a high-quality
control group of 752 asteroid spin periods, we found that one of our solutions
is accurate (within 5%) in 88% of the cases. The best-fit, secondary, and
tertiary solutions are accurate in 55%, 27%, and 6% of the cases, respectively.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16409v1
Astro arXiv | astro-ph.EP
The mass-radius relation of intermediate-mass planets outlined by hydrodynamic escape and thermal evolution by Daria Kubyshkina et al. on Monday 21 November
We employ planetary evolution modeling to reproduce the MR distribution of
the 198 so far detected planets with mass and radius measured to the <45% and
<15% level, respectively, and less massive than 108Me. We simultaneously
account for atmospheric escape, based on the results of hydrodynamic models,
and thermal evolution, based on planetary structure evolution models. Since
high-energy stellar radiation affects atmospheric evolution, we account for the
entire range of possible stellar rotation histories. To set the planetary
parameters at formation, we use analytical approximations based on formation
models. Finally, we build a grid of synthetic planets with parameters
reflecting those of the observed distribution. The predicted radius spread
reproduces well the observed MR distribution, except for two distinct groups of
outliers (~20% of the population). The first one consists of close-in
Saturn-mass planets with Jupiter-like radii for which we underpredict the
radius likely because it lacks additional heating similar to that responsible
for inflation in hot Jupiters. The second group consists of warm sub-Neptunes,
which should host massive primordial H-dominated atmospheres, but instead
present high densities indicative of small gaseous envelopes. This suggests
that their formation, internal structure, and evolution are different from that
of atmospheric evolution through the escape of H-dominated envelopes accreted
onto rocky cores. The observed characteristics of low-mass planets (<10-15Me)
strongly depend on the impact of atmospheric escape, and thus on the evolution
of the host star, while primordial parameters are less relevant. Instead, for
more massive planets, the parameters at formation play the dominant role in
shaping the final MR distribution.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10166v1
