A dialogue with Esther George, Founder Zyber Global Centre

https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts116/v4/8d/ae/c2/8daec28f-c4e4-3af1-f1ad-572efc3e6178/mza_1960210551209027645.jpg/600x600bb.jpg

Accountability in the Digital Age

Dialogues I4ADA

58 episodes

4 days ago

The Institute for Accountability in the Digital Age (I4ADA) was founded in 2017 with the mission to ensure that issues and concerns do not undermine the Internet’s potential for increasing access to knowledge, spreading global tolerance and understanding, and promoting sustainable prosperity. The I4ADA dialogues are recorded online interviews with participants which represent stakeholders from civil society, academia, the business technology community, lawyers and policy-makers. This video is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatices 4.0 Internation

Non-Profit

Business

RSS

All content for Accountability in the Digital Age is the property of Dialogues I4ADA and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.

Non-Profit

Business

https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/production/podcast_uploaded/16686026/16686026-1639842835319-745761740a284.jpg

A dialogue with Esther George, Founder Zyber Global Centre

Accountability in the Digital Age

35 minutes 59 seconds

2 years ago

A dialogue with Esther George, Founder Zyber Global Centre

Esther George is an Independent Cybercrime and Cybersecurity Specialist and Former Senior Prosecutor for the Crown (UK). In the I4ADA Dialogue she discusses her view on Cyber Crime. Also see: https://zyberglobal.com. And for more information on the Zyber Global Community, please visit https://www.facebook.com/groups/zyberglobalcommunity

While everybody seems to be aware of cybercrime, why are the amount of cybercrime prosecutions relatively modest? What is the problem with statistics? What are the roles of respectively media, victims and reporting? Would segmenting and otherwise nuancing this vast domain be beneficial? Do these fit in the current rule of law scope and definitions? Is there a difference between cybercrime and cyber-enabled crimes? What are the current key threats in cyber? How to address and counter those? How to make the conversation more diverse and inclusive, and get all at the table?