Home
Categories
EXPLORE
True Crime
Comedy
Society & Culture
Business
Sports
History
Health & Fitness
About Us
Contact Us
Copyright
© 2024 PodJoint
00:00 / 00:00
Sign in

or

Don't have an account?
Sign up
Forgot password
https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts115/v4/26/8b/17/268b17a2-ed34-eccb-8309-ea2dc7e448de/mza_16381236907644405491.jpg/600x600bb.jpg
377: The legal battle against India’s anti-LGBTQ law
ATS Studio
13 episodes
1 week ago
377 is a scripted narrative podcast about the legal action and accompanying social movement against Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. This anti-sodomy law was largely used to target MSM (men who have sex with men) populations in India and though rarely enforced, it was wielded as a threat against LGBTQI+ populations until 2018, when it was finally read down by the Indian Supreme Court.
Show more...
Documentary
Society & Culture
RSS
All content for 377: The legal battle against India’s anti-LGBTQ law is the property of ATS Studio and is served directly from their servers with no modification, redirects, or rehosting. The podcast is not affiliated with or endorsed by Podjoint in any way.
377 is a scripted narrative podcast about the legal action and accompanying social movement against Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. This anti-sodomy law was largely used to target MSM (men who have sex with men) populations in India and though rarely enforced, it was wielded as a threat against LGBTQI+ populations until 2018, when it was finally read down by the Indian Supreme Court.
Show more...
Documentary
Society & Culture
https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/production/podcast_uploaded_nologo400/17628464/17628464-1630765481320-0642b1ece97ab.jpg
Episode 10 - A Five-Judge Bench
377: The legal battle against India’s anti-LGBTQ law
30 minutes 40 seconds
4 years ago
Episode 10 - A Five-Judge Bench

Many fresh voices enter the arena: using Article 32, five highly accomplished individuals (Navtej Singh Johar and others) and 20 students from IIT submit their petitions to the Supreme Court. They are represented by Menaka Guruswamy and Arundati Katju. We meet Saurabh Kirpal, a lawyer on their team who explains to us how a fresh Article 32 petition differs from the curative petitions that remained pending.

And then Puttuswamy happened: the 2017 case which ruled that the Aadhar biometric ID system violated Article 21 of the constitution. The judgment went through and corrected a long list of landmark cases that involved privacy, and one of them was Suresh Kumar Kaushal.

So in January 2018, Chief Justice Dipak Mishra hand-picks the new petition and the 377 battle is reignited. A court date is set: June 6, 2018.

Show Notes

All clips and voices used in this podcast are owned by the original creators.

The following guests appeared in this episode:

  • Shyam Divan
  • Saurabh Kirpal, lawyer
  • Ritu Dalmia
  • Jayna Kothari
  • Anand Grover
  • Anand Vasudevan, IIT alum

References

  • Arundhati Katju and Menaka Guruswamy Time 100 interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqsEtc8dq5c
  • Katju and Guruswamy at the Oxford Union: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Lp6H4YYN-k
  • CNBC TV18 news clip Supreme Court reopening hearing on S377: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rz98mgrXmz8
  • Al Jazeera news clip on Puttaswamy verdict: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYkWqWWvv7s
  • NDTV news clip about Puttaswamy’s implications for privacy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgDz2uGMjCE
  • Republic World news clip about Supreme Court judges speaking out against the then Chief Justice of India: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcoXml36tss
  • Ritu Dalmia’s interview with NDTV: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DV8RXUSg4BE
  • Keshav Suri interview with ET Now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsWlFbX348Y

Mirror Now news clip about IIT petitioners: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nam0m8SsUpI

377: The legal battle against India’s anti-LGBTQ law
377 is a scripted narrative podcast about the legal action and accompanying social movement against Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. This anti-sodomy law was largely used to target MSM (men who have sex with men) populations in India and though rarely enforced, it was wielded as a threat against LGBTQI+ populations until 2018, when it was finally read down by the Indian Supreme Court.