Inflation is often a critical factor in shaping the political landscape, particularly during election periods, and the 2024 presidential election has been no exception. Rising costs have impacted voter sentiment significantly, dampening enthusiasm particularly for Kamala Harris while simultaneously boosting support for Donald Trump. Political economist David A. Steinberg pointed out how these economic conditions have been central to voter decision-making processes.

Additionally, the 2024 election highlighted the crucial role of those who facilitate the democratic process. In the aftermath of the election, there was an outpouring of appreciation for the front-line workers of democracy, celebrating their efforts to maintain a largely nonviolent and smooth electoral process. The robustness of this process, despite the adversities, remains a testament to the strength of the democratic system in the United States, showcasing the dedication and integrity of countless individuals behind the scenes.

Meanwhile, another subplot unfolded as an automatic recount was triggered in the closely contested McCormick-Casey U.S. Senate race in Philadelphia. Although local officials were skeptical about the recount altering the initial outcome, the procedure underscored the transparency and accountability mechanisms inherent in the electoral system, further demonstrating the resilience of democratic practices in handling close contests.

This collection of events around the 2024 election provides insights into the multifaceted nature of political dynamics in the United States, highlighting how economic, social, and procedural factors converge to shape outcomes and public trust in the electoral system.